Zogby Interactive: Obama leads McCain 273-158
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 06:19:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Zogby Interactive: Obama leads McCain 273-158
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Zogby Interactive: Obama leads McCain 273-158  (Read 2270 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,198
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 06, 2008, 11:45:35 PM »

UTICA, New York – As the race for President passes the Independence Day holiday and heads toward the dog days of summer, Sen. Barack Obama holds a 44% to 38% lead over Sen. John McCain in the horserace contest, but also leads by a substantial margin in a state-by-state Electoral College tally, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows.

The extensive national poll of of 46,274 likely voters also shows Libertarian candidate and former Congressman Bob Barr wins 6% support, eating into McCain’s needed conservative base of support.

The online survey was conducted from June 11-30, 2008. It carries a margin of error of 0.5 percentage points. After nearly a decade in development, the Zogby Interactive survey on a state level was remarkably accurate in the 2006 midterm elections. In 18 U.S. Senate elections polled two years ago, the Zogby online survey correctly identified the winner of 17 of 18 races, and in the 18th race – in Missouri, it was still within the margin of error, though it had Republican Jim Talent winning (he was defeated narrowly by Democrat Claire McCaskill).

This latest extensive survey of all 50 states reveals that while Obama holds a narrow lead in the national preference test, he holds a substantial advantage right now in the Electoral College. Using this survey - and an average of other public state polls in certain states to corroborate the Zogby results – Zogby calculates that Obama leads McCain, 273-158. A total of 11 states with 105 electoral votes are within the margin of error and therefore too close to call. A candidate needs 270 to be elected President.

Neither Obama nor McCain breaks a 50% favorable rating. Obama is viewed as very or somewhat favorable by 49.7%. For McCain, that number is 43.2%.

Pollster John Zogby: “Obama is in the driver’s seat right now, especially where it really counts - in the electoral votes. Bob Barr could really hurt McCain’s chances. McCain can’t afford the level of slippage to Barr we found among conservatives in this polling. While there has been plenty of talk about Obama’s recent emphasis on his centrist positions, he can get away with it during these dog days of the campaign as McCain finds himself still trying to shore up the conservative base. McCain will have to move to the center because right now Obama is clobbering him among independents. But there is the rub for McCain: Bob Barr has some juice among conservatives and is hurting him in several states. ”

Bob Barr receives the support of 7% of voters who identify themselves as conservative or very conservative voters. Barr gets 43% of libertarians and 11% of independents. McCain’s support among conservatives is 74%. On the left, Ralph Nader gets less than 2% nationally.

Obama has the support of 83% of Democrats, while McCain gets 75% of Republicans.

Independents break 39% for Obama, compared with 31% who support McCain.

For white voters, race doesn’t appear to be playing a significant factor. McCain leads Obama, 43%-39%, with Barr at 6%. Among black voters, Obama wins the vast majority of support.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1523
Logged
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,510


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2008, 11:48:09 PM »

Where are the state by state results? I don't know why I'm getting excited over this though... it's Zogby
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,198
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2008, 11:49:35 PM »
« Edited: July 06, 2008, 11:58:24 PM by Tender Branson »

The big question is:

With 46.000 Likely Voters, did they poll all 50 states - or just the 15-20 previously mentioned on their homepage - and where can we find state-by-state results ? Or is it just an abnormal big national sample ?

But Zogby states: "A total of 11 states with 105 electoral votes are within the margin of error and therefore too close to call. A candidate needs 270 to be elected President."

He also says: "... extensive national poll of of 46,274 likely voters, ...carries a margin of error of 0.5 percentage points."

Because I don´t believe 11 states are within 0.5%, all 50 states probably were polled. Maybe I can find the results somewhere ...
Logged
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,510


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2008, 11:59:09 PM »

This is the best 273-158 (With 107 too close) I could create. Does anyone have any more realistic guesses?



Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,870


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2008, 11:59:38 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2008, 12:09:50 AM »

LOL, it's the interactive Zogby goodness!

Though, the internals, as favorable as they are to Obama, seem substantial.  I have to see a confirmation of them by Gallup or something.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,198
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2008, 12:25:36 AM »

This is the best 273-158 (With 107 too close) I could create. Does anyone have any more realistic guesses?



Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 07, 2008, 12:36:44 AM »
« Edited: July 07, 2008, 12:40:21 AM by Verily »

Here's another possible 273-158-107 breakdown. More likely, I think, than the two solutions showing SC as a toss-up. An alternative to better match recent polls would be to switch South Dakota and Alaska, and Iowa and Oregon are also easily interchangeable.

Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,628
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2008, 02:38:48 AM »

A joke poll but I'm curious to see the state by state breakdown anyway.
Logged
Bay Ridge, Bklyn! Born and Bred
MikeyCNY
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,181


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2008, 08:31:57 AM »


Obama has the support of 83% of Democrats, while McCain gets 75% of Republicans.


LOL.

But at least the electoral count (roughly) mirrors RCP's Obama 238, McCain 163, Tossup 130.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,874
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2008, 02:41:52 PM »

How do these online polls work exactly?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2008, 02:44:32 PM »

How do these online polls work exactly?

You sign up, you vote.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2008, 02:45:24 PM »

Where are the state by state results? I don't know why I'm getting excited over this though... it's Zogby


I'm guessing he's not released the state-by-state polls in fear that we would laugh too hard at them.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 07, 2008, 02:53:42 PM »

According the new Zogby Interactive Poll, Ron Paul currently leads 538-0

Anyway, knowing Zogby here is my 273-158-107



The sad part is I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest


Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2008, 02:58:18 PM »

According the new Zogby Interactive Poll, Ron Paul currently leads 538-0

Anyway, knowing Zogby here is my 273-158-107



The sad part is I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest

Neither would I.  This is the most reasonable map posted so far.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,874
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2008, 04:17:57 PM »


So there is really no attempt whatsoever at randomization? If it's really as you describe then it's not a poll at all, but a vote. MOE is meaningless as a concept. A vote is exact (in theory...counting problems aside) and has no MOE.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 07, 2008, 04:25:32 PM »

So there is really no attempt whatsoever at randomization? If it's really as you describe then it's not a poll at all, but a vote. MOE is meaningless as a concept. A vote is exact (in theory...counting problems aside) and has no MOE.

It's a vote that they are projecting onto a pollable phenomenon based on shared criteria (claimed residence in a state)

In other words, it's total crap.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,870


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2008, 04:31:55 PM »

So there is really no attempt whatsoever at randomization? If it's really as you describe then it's not a poll at all, but a vote. MOE is meaningless as a concept. A vote is exact (in theory...counting problems aside) and has no MOE.

It's a vote that they are projecting onto a pollable phenomenon based on shared criteria (claimed residence in a state)

In other words, it's total crap.

Hence the article I posted earlier in this thread.  It's really the same error, 72 years later.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2008, 04:33:15 PM »

Hence the article I posted earlier in this thread.  It's really the same error, 72 years later.

Yeah, that made me LOL at several points throughout.  The parallels are pretty hilarious.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2008, 04:38:16 PM »

So there is really no attempt whatsoever at randomization? If it's really as you describe then it's not a poll at all, but a vote. MOE is meaningless as a concept. A vote is exact (in theory...counting problems aside) and has no MOE.

It's a vote that they are projecting onto a pollable phenomenon based on shared criteria (claimed residence in a state)

In other words, it's total crap.

Are you sure Zogby doesn't weight the hell out of it (like he does his phone polls), so that the results are not truly laughable?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 07, 2008, 04:43:45 PM »

So there is really no attempt whatsoever at randomization? If it's really as you describe then it's not a poll at all, but a vote. MOE is meaningless as a concept. A vote is exact (in theory...counting problems aside) and has no MOE.

It's a vote that they are projecting onto a pollable phenomenon based on shared criteria (claimed residence in a state)

In other words, it's total crap.

Are you sure Zogby doesn't weight the hell out of it (like he does his phone polls), so that the results are not truly laughable?

I didn't say he didn't.  I have no idea.  He might as well.  When you've burnt the sh**t out of your dinner, you might as well throw on a little jerk spice, but it really doesn't matter.
Logged
xzcyhj
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 08, 2008, 07:33:00 PM »

Online Poll,haha. AOL.......
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,411
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 08, 2008, 08:48:40 PM »

MCCAIN WILL LOSE ARIZONA! THE ZOGBY SAID IT!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 09, 2008, 03:51:36 AM »

So there is really no attempt whatsoever at randomization? If it's really as you describe then it's not a poll at all, but a vote. MOE is meaningless as a concept. A vote is exact (in theory...counting problems aside) and has no MOE.

It's a vote that they are projecting onto a pollable phenomenon based on shared criteria (claimed residence in a state)

In other words, it's total crap.

Are you sure Zogby doesn't weight the hell out of it (like he does his phone polls), so that the results are not truly laughable?
It is quite obvious that he does.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.239 seconds with 13 queries.