Low-Birth-Weight and Obesity Rates Both on the Rise in U.S. Kids
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 02:00:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Low-Birth-Weight and Obesity Rates Both on the Rise in U.S. Kids
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Low-Birth-Weight and Obesity Rates Both on the Rise in U.S. Kids  (Read 1735 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,024


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 13, 2007, 08:22:28 PM »

BETHESDA, Md., July 13 -- More low-birth-weight infants are being born but older kids are heavier than ever, according to the federal government's latest snapshot of child health.

In its 10th annual report, the Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics showed little change in the overall well-being of American children from last year's numbers, but it revealed a few encouraging as well as a few distressing trends.

The report, titled America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2007, is a compilation of statistics on children's health, family life, housing, education, and behavior, gathered from cabinet-level departments plus the Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, and the Office of Management and Budget.

"When we review the health aspects of the report, we see some continuing problems, we see progress, and we see differences by race, by ethnicity and by poverty level or income level," commented Edward Sondik, Ph.D., director of the National Center for Health Statistics, in a press briefing.

Among the positives, he said are improved immunization rates among toddlers over the past decade, with 81% of children ages 19 to 35 months having received the recommended series of vaccinations, up from 70% in 1994.

"This indicator is particularly significant, because we do not see differences here by race or ethnicity," he said.

In addition, the birth rate for teens 15 to 17 has continued to decline, to a record low of 21 per 1,000, down from 39 per 1,000 in 1991. The birth rate for non-Hispanic black girls declined by 60% from 1991 to 2005, reversing a trend toward higher teen births in this population from 1986 to 1991. Among non-Hispanic white girls, the birth rate declined by half over the same period.

Second-hand smoke, as measured by detectable levels of the nicotine metabolite cotinine in the blood of children, also declined significantly, from 88% in 1988 to 1094, to 59% in 2001 to 2004.

"But still, more than half of children ages four to 11 have detectable levels," Dr. Sondik said.

Asthma rates, included as a health indicator for the first time in the annual reports, occurred in 2005 in about 9% of children from birth to age 17, with about 5% of all children having or more asthma attacks during the previous year. As seen in other studies, asthma prevalence was higher among African Americans, at 13%, and although Hispanics in general had about a 9% asthma prevalence, the prevalence among children of Puerto Rican origin was 20%, compared with only about 5% for Mexican Americans.

"It must be related to some kinds of differences in the environments to which they were exposed as younger children, or genetic susceptibility differences among these subparts of the population," commented Duane Alexander, M.D., director of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Among the negative trends was the increase in the percentage of infants with a low birth weight, which has grown steadily from 6.7% in 1984, to 9.2% in 2003.

"We've got all this technology to help kids with low birth weight survive, but what we haven't been as successful with is prenatal care, particularly for low income populations, and that's what determines a lot of the low birth weights that we see," said community health specialist Shari Nethersole, M.D., of Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, who was not involved with the report.

Over roughly the same period, the proportion of children ages six to 17 who were overweight increased from 6% in 1976 to 1980 to 11% in 1988 to 1994 and continued to rise to 18 in 2003 to 2004. Dr. Sondik cited the prospect, if the trend continues, of higher rates of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and other health problems.

Among the other notable elements of the report (all changes are significant unless otherwise noted):

5% of children ages four to 17 were reported by a parent to have definite or severe emotional or behavioral difficulties. Eighty-one percent of the parents consulted a health care provider or school staff member about their child's difficulties, 40% reported that their child was prescribed medication for the problem, and 47% reported that the child had received non-drug therapy.
60% of children in 2005 were living in counties where one or more air pollutants was above allowable levels, up from 46% in 2004.
10% of children lived in communities with substandard drinking water, up from 8% in 2004.
Blood lead levels in children ages one to five were unchanged, at a median of 1.6 g/dL.
More children are living in households where the cost of shelter is burdensome, conditions are crowded, or the housing is physically inadequate. The rate was 40% in 2005, compared with 37% in 2003.
The rate of adolescents ages 12 to 17 involved in serious crimes increased from 14/1,000 in 2004, to 17/1,000 in 2005.

The report is available for download at http://childstats.gov or by clicking the complimentary link at the top right of your screen.
------------
Discuss.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,886


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2007, 12:32:12 AM »

66% of adults age 20 or older are overweight (BMI >= 25)
31% of adults age 20 or older are obese (BMI >= 30)

That's just pathetic.

http://win.niddk.nih.gov/statistics/index.htm#whydodiffer
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2007, 11:46:24 PM »

66% of adults age 20 or older are overweight (BMI >= 25)
31% of adults age 20 or older are obese (BMI >= 30)

That's just pathetic.

http://win.niddk.nih.gov/statistics/index.htm#whydodiffer

Well, our entire society is composed in a manner that facilitates obesity. Neighborhoods are not designed so that you can walk places. Our entertaining technology (movies, computers, etc) is so good that it's hard to get away from them  People tend to go for high calorie convenience/restaurant foods now that family dinners are less common. I really don't see how this trend is going to change.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2007, 03:36:54 AM »

The right-wing economic policies of the last 30 years have been particularly deleterious for The Children.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2007, 09:33:24 AM »

66% of adults age 20 or older are overweight (BMI >= 25)
31% of adults age 20 or older are obese (BMI >= 30)

That's just pathetic.

http://win.niddk.nih.gov/statistics/index.htm#whydodiffer

The government weight definitions have been proven to be a complete joke. I know at least 4 body builders who, by government standards, are considered obese.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2007, 09:49:24 AM »

66% of adults age 20 or older are overweight (BMI >= 25)
31% of adults age 20 or older are obese (BMI >= 30)

That's just pathetic.

http://win.niddk.nih.gov/statistics/index.htm#whydodiffer

The government weight definitions have been proven to be a complete joke. I know at least 4 body builders who, by government standards, are considered obese.

That's because their bodies are too large, States.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2007, 10:18:15 AM »

States does have somewhat of a point. Because BMI is only a ratio of height and weight, people with an unusual amount of muscle are penalized unfairly. What BMI demonstrates well, however, is that Americans are indeed getting fatter over the years, which is not a healthy development, for a number of reasons.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2007, 11:40:37 AM »

Plus, about 2-3 years back the government made adjustments downwards on the scale in regards to weight and blood pressure. That obviously was a move to further benefit the drug industry, especially companies that sell BP and Cholesterol medicines.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2007, 11:45:57 AM »

Plus, about 2-3 years back the government made adjustments downwards on the scale in regards to weight and blood pressure. That obviously was a move to further benefit the drug industry, especially companies that sell BP and Cholesterol medicines.

Although the vast majority of those who are overweight are overweight for valid reasons.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2007, 11:48:12 AM »

Plus, about 2-3 years back the government made adjustments downwards on the scale in regards to weight and blood pressure. That obviously was a move to further benefit the drug industry, especially companies that sell BP and Cholesterol medicines.

Although the vast majority of those who are overweight are overweight for valid reasons.

True.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2007, 02:24:57 PM »

Plus, about 2-3 years back the government made adjustments downwards on the scale in regards to weight and blood pressure. That obviously was a move to further benefit the drug industry, especially companies that sell BP and Cholesterol medicines.

Although the vast majority of those who are overweight are overweight for valid reasons.

True.

And by valid reasons...I meant valid reasons to be considered overweight, not that they have a good reason to be overweight.

Sorry.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2007, 12:04:26 PM »

It's very unfortunate that the government—but especially the public—does not seem to be taking the obesity epidemic seriously enough.  Especially the worrisome problem of obesity among those on public assistance.

More and more people are going to start having severe, adverse health effects because of the poison clogging their veins.  Diabetes, High Blood Pressure, Heart Failure...all on the public dime.

And meanwhile, schools are cutting after school sports programs and removing gym classes from the curricula.  Pathetic.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2007, 12:17:04 PM »

States does have somewhat of a point. Because BMI is only a ratio of height and weight, people with an unusual amount of muscle are penalized unfairly. What BMI demonstrates well, however, is that Americans are indeed getting fatter over the years, which is not a healthy development, for a number of reasons.

According to my height/weight, I fall into the "normal weight" category according to the NIH online calculation.  However, if you use the table from just a few years ago, I would be "overweight."  In order to get back to the "normal weight" which the NIH says I am now, I would have to lose 40 lbs, putting me back at the weight I was at when I was 21 . . . and I only had 3% body fat back then.  But for all the flaws in the BMI, it is a way to encourage folks to do better about keeping the weight off, however, the only way to know if you are in good health is to have a yearly physical performed by your doctor.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 16, 2007, 12:44:32 PM »

While using body fat as a measure of obesity is ideal, I sincerely doubt the reason why so many people are in the BMI "danger zone" is because of a sharp increase in amateur bodybuilding.
Logged
AkSaber
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,315
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2007, 06:59:06 AM »

I agree that the BMI is not an ideal indicator of being overweight, but there is an obesity problem looming in this country.

With the advent of mechanized industry, farmers are able to harvest more food than ever before. The more food out there, the cheaper it is. And living the country with the richest economy, we have a lot of cash to spend on inexpensive food. Not to mention the junk food industry, but so many of our non-junk foods have so much artificial hormones and crap injected into them. And our modern culture, with automobiles, as well as electronics like video game consoles and T.V.s, has reduced our exercise to almost nothing.

So, we are able to buy mountains of inexpensive, unhealthy food, coupled with zero exercise, will lead to obesity and its associated health problems.

Also, I believe that our dependency on junk food is nothing less than an addiction. It just tastes so damn good. I speak from experience here when I say it is very difficult to substitute organic food for the unhealthy stuff. Organic food does just not taste nearly as good, and does not fill you up like junk food does. I've tried eating fistfulls of baby carrots at once, and afterwards I was not any less hungry. With me being on the diet I'm on, I have to abstain from the unhealthy foods. I wonder if the way I feel must be the same way an alcoholic or a smoker feels. I miss the junk food, a lot, think about it often during the day, get strong urges to indulge in some, and really look forward to the next time I'll have the good stuff.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 17, 2007, 07:36:55 AM »


One of the things I miss most about Hawaii is all of the parks available for use.  There were always start-up teams of baseball/softball going on, along with soccer and frisbee.  All you had to do was walk down the street and join in.  Out here, the life style is much different.  Everyone works works works, and when you get home after 7pm, you have more work to do.  And with scientific research showing that stress causes weight gain, I'm not surprised that our society has a weight problem. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.235 seconds with 12 queries.