Should Georgia pass a law making jurors anonymous?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:33:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Should Georgia pass a law making jurors anonymous?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ^
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
Yes (R)
 
#3
Yes (O/I)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
No (R)
 
#6
No (O/I)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 37

Author Topic: Should Georgia pass a law making jurors anonymous?  (Read 345 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,507
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 18, 2023, 05:05:09 PM »
« edited: August 18, 2023, 05:25:48 PM by darklordoftech »

Apparently jurors aren’t anonymous in Georgia.
Logged
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2023, 05:08:58 PM »

Yes (O/I)

Jurors could be and have been doxed because of this.
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,334
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2023, 08:26:30 PM »

Yes. For as long as there have been juries, jurors have been stalked, intimidated, harassed, assaulted, blackmailed, extorted, bribed, and even killed, by both the defense and the prosecution in order to change the outcome of the trial.

For the sake of justice, jurors must be completely anonymous.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,010
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2023, 09:00:52 AM »

Apparently jurors aren’t anonymous in Georgia.

Jurors are only anonymous in exceptional circumstances.  The first anonymous jury wasn't empaneled in the United States until 1977. 
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2023, 05:58:58 PM »

No, of course not. Jurors aren't anonymous by default in any state, as far as I know, and it would probably be unconstitutional to do so.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,876
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2023, 06:00:57 PM »

No, of course not. Jurors aren't anonymous by default in any state, as far as I know, and it would probably be unconstitutional to do so.
Why would it most likely be unconstitutional?
Logged
BigZuck08
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,091
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 1.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2023, 06:01:51 PM »

Yes. I feel that this is necessary to prevent juror intimidation.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 20, 2023, 06:08:16 PM »

No, of course not. Jurors aren't anonymous by default in any state, as far as I know, and it would probably be unconstitutional to do so.
Why would it most likely be unconstitutional?

The First Amendment guarantees the press and the public a right to attend criminal trials. Public proceedings are a basic guard against bias and unfair proceedings. Part of having an open and transparent legal system is knowing the names of jurors.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,876
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2023, 06:13:11 PM »

No, of course not. Jurors aren't anonymous by default in any state, as far as I know, and it would probably be unconstitutional to do so.
Why would it most likely be unconstitutional?

The First Amendment guarantees the press and the public a right to attend criminal trials. Public proceedings are a basic guard against bias and unfair proceedings. Part of having an open and transparent legal system is knowing the names of jurors.
Ah. That makes sense.
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,334
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 21, 2023, 09:05:48 PM »

No, of course not. Jurors aren't anonymous by default in any state, as far as I know, and it would probably be unconstitutional to do so.
Why would it most likely be unconstitutional?

The First Amendment guarantees the press and the public a right to attend criminal trials. Public proceedings are a basic guard against bias and unfair proceedings. Part of having an open and transparent legal system is knowing the names of jurors.

The right to a fair trial cuts both ways. If the defense is intimidating jurors, the prosecution has a right to know.
Logged
Sumner 1868
Maps are a good thing
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,093
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 21, 2023, 11:36:28 PM »

No, but witness protection should be allowed for those who face the wrath of Qanoners.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 14 queries.