Elizabeth Dole as NRSC head and 2008 races
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 12:04:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Elizabeth Dole as NRSC head and 2008 races
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Elizabeth Dole as NRSC head and 2008 races  (Read 1763 times)
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 09, 2006, 12:21:13 AM »

She is taking a beating, but besides throwing all that money at Chafee, I am not sure what she could have done differently.  It was a brutal cycle for the job.  She couldnt duct tape George Allen's mouth shut, couldnt keep Conrad Burns from insulting firefighters, or couldnt keep Bob Taft from destroying the career of Mike DeWine.  I know she beat Norm Coleman out by 1 vote for the job, but would it really have mattered?  Almost better Coleman didnt get tainted by this job this year.

Looking ahead to 2008, Senator Ensign will have a difficult job as initial looks show the Democrats in good shape in 2008 races.  But then again, anyone who said in Nov. 04 that the Democrats would pick up 6 Senate seats this time around would have been dismissed with many a laugh.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2006, 12:39:58 AM »

2008 will all depend on who retires, who is recruited to run and who heads the top of the ticket.  Prez elections are very different than midterm elections in this way, because the third factor can sometimes trump the other two.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,626
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2006, 12:40:21 AM »

She was terrible but that was only one of many problems they had.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2006, 12:40:51 AM »

Her biggest problem was in recruitment and the fact that she's politically tone-deaf.
Logged
okstate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 383


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2006, 12:45:18 AM »

Safe Republican

Alabama (Sessions)
Alaska (Stevens)
Idaho (Craig)
Kansas (Roberts)
Kentucky (McConnell)
Mississippi (Cochran)
Nebraska (Hagel)
New Mexico (Domenici)
Oklahoma (Inhofe)
Wyoming (Enzi)

Likely Republican

Georgia (Chambliss)
Maine (Collins)
New Hampshire (Sununu)
North Carolina (Dole)
Oregon (Smith)
South Carolina (Graham)
Tennessee (Alexander)
Virginia (Warner)

Lean Republican

Minnesota (Coleman)
Texas (Cornyn)

Tossup

Colorado (Allard)

Lean Democrat

Louisiana (Landrieu)
New Jersey (Lautenberg)
South Dakota (Johnson)

Likely Democrat

Arkansas (Pryor)
Delaware (OPEN; Biden)
Iowa (Harkin)
Montana (Baucus)

Safe Democrat

Illinois (Durbin)
Massachusetts (Kerry)
Michigan (Levin)
Rhode Island (Reed)
West Virginia (Rockefeller)

Some guessing, and assuming no more retirements. Obviously retirements would shift a lot of races.
Logged
Deano963
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,866


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2006, 12:49:26 AM »

I'm betting the very first official act of John Ensign as NRSC Chair will be to crawl on his hands and knees to Susan Collins and prostate himself on the floor before her and beg her not to retire (I'm not saying she is planning on retiring, just that she might).

Offer her whatever she wants, John, b/c Republicans are a dying breed in the NE and she is the only person who can hold the seat for you.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2006, 12:52:02 AM »

Not so sure on New Hampshire being so safe, and as long as John Warner wants the seat in VA it would probably be his...but an open race would be competitive
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2006, 12:53:32 AM »

Susan Collins pledged to not serve more than two terms....we'll see if she keeps her promise.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2006, 12:55:22 AM »

Cornyn is not retiring and should at least be in Likely.  I mean, he'll never get over 60% unless the opponent is hapless, but it's just very hard for a Democrat to win 45% in Texas statewide nowadays, unless they're the reincarnation of Lloyd Bentsen.  Might not even happen there, because a Presidential election makes it even harder.
Logged
okstate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 383


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2006, 12:57:16 AM »

I was thinking his low approvals, or at least they were low.

But yea you are right probably should be likely.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,626
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2006, 12:59:19 AM »

Not so sure on New Hampshire being so safe, and as long as John Warner wants the seat in VA it would probably be his...but an open race would be competitive

An open race is Mark Warner's for the taking if he wants it.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 09, 2006, 01:12:47 AM »

I was thinking his low approvals, or at least they were low.

But yea you are right probably should be likely.

Considering less than half of adults vote in Texas in Prez elections, I don't place much stock in a poll of 600 adults among a figure who tends to be loved/hated by the partisans, as Cornyn is.
Logged
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 09, 2006, 01:12:51 AM »

Not so sure on New Hampshire being so safe, and as long as John Warner wants the seat in VA it would probably be his...but an open race would be competitive

Yeh I totoally agree the NH seat is probabaly the biggest challenge for the Repblicans in 08 in Sununu, follwed by Allard Seat, then the Coleman seat.  hopefully am wrong and John Warner runs and wins, which he would
Logged
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 09, 2006, 01:14:34 AM »

Not so sure on New Hampshire being so safe, and as long as John Warner wants the seat in VA it would probably be his...but an open race would be competitive

Yeh I totoally agree the NH seat is probabaly the biggest challenge for the Repblicans in 08 in Sununu, follwed by Allard Seat, then the Coleman seat.  hopefully am wrong and John Warner runs and wins, which he would

sorry i am on sleep medicicrne and can barley funvtion right now or type
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2006, 03:58:35 AM »


If the Democrats recruit a top-tier candidate like former Governor Kitzhaber or 4th District Congressman DeFazio, this will definitely be a tossup. Smith isn't personally offensive, and he's decent on a few issues (drilling in ANWR, for one), but he's a bit too conservative for the state.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 09, 2006, 10:13:14 AM »

Cornyn is not retiring and should at least be in Likely.  I mean, he'll never get over 60% unless the opponent is hapless, but it's just very hard for a Democrat to win 45% in Texas statewide nowadays, unless they're the reincarnation of Lloyd Bentsen.  Might not even happen there, because a Presidential election makes it even harder.

It would actually be very reminiscent of New Jersey this year, come to think of it.

Also, I think Louisiana will be a toss-up. Landrieu is very weak, and Hurricane Katrina made Louisiana slightly more Republican.

OTOH, I would call NJ at least Likely Democrat. Lautenberg would win in a walk as would any of potential replacements should he re-retire. His low approval ratings mean nothing; NJ gives everyone low approval ratings.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 09, 2006, 10:15:53 AM »

Lautenberg will be 84 though in 2008.  I know it seems that senators just keep on serving older and older but some of the restless Democrats like Andrews, Pallone and Holt may want to try for the seat. 
Logged
RJ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 793
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 09, 2006, 10:35:26 AM »
« Edited: November 09, 2006, 10:38:16 AM by RJ »

She is taking a beating, but besides throwing all that money at Chafee, I am not sure what she could have done differently.  It was a brutal cycle for the job.  She couldnt duct tape George Allen's mouth shut, couldnt keep Conrad Burns from insulting firefighters, or couldnt keep Bob Taft from destroying the career of Mike DeWine. 

Pete Ricketts
Susan Harris
Mike McGavick
Mark Kennedy
Dwight Grotberg

Nebraska, Florida, Washington, Minnesota, and North Dakota were some real oppurtunities for the Republican party this year and this is the best they could do? When your party is in the majority and the majority of senate candidates up for reelection are in the minority party, that's called an oppurtunity. To top things off, you not only do not gain more seats and give your party a real mandate, you lose your advantage as the majority alltogether. .


Here in Ohio a guy named Jim Petro, the state auditor, ran for Governor and tried to win the nomination. I think he could have made trouble for Strickland, more so than Blackwell. Lynn Swann may have looked like a winner at the time, but no one looked closer at what kind of campaign he would run against one of the more vulnerable governors? I would also figure if the Republican candidate was breathing in Kansas or Oklahoma, that person would have an immediate advantage over their Democratic counterpart. Neither of these races were even close. I could go on all night about disaster after disaster in Governors, Senators, and Congressional candidates this year.

This is not a new thing, either. Many are familiar with key elections in Illinois and Washington two years ago not to mention the 2 governor's races last year. I don't expect them to win all of these elections, but at least make it competitive and give your constiuents the idea you're trying. Maybe this year was a bad year to be a Republican, but when your campaigns are that bad and you lose decisive control overnight, something's radically wrong.

Mrs. Dole, all these things put together=a rotten job as head of the NRSC.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 09, 2006, 10:38:11 AM »

Cornyn is not retiring and should at least be in Likely.  I mean, he'll never get over 60% unless the opponent is hapless, but it's just very hard for a Democrat to win 45% in Texas statewide nowadays, unless they're the reincarnation of Lloyd Bentsen.  Might not even happen there, because a Presidential election makes it even harder.

It would actually be very reminiscent of New Jersey this year, come to think of it.

Also, I think Louisiana will be a toss-up. Landrieu is very weak, and Hurricane Katrina made Louisiana slightly more Republican.

OTOH, I would call NJ at least Likely Democrat. Lautenberg would win in a walk as would any of potential replacements should he re-retire. His low approval ratings mean nothing; NJ gives everyone low approval ratings.

Not really.  If this was not the 2006 elections, the NJ race would have been a veritable toss-up.

Corruption does hurt.  And even in a banner Democratic year, which was especially strong in the NE, Menendez running as an incumbent still only got 53%.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 09, 2006, 02:03:16 PM »

Cornyn is not retiring and should at least be in Likely.  I mean, he'll never get over 60% unless the opponent is hapless, but it's just very hard for a Democrat to win 45% in Texas statewide nowadays, unless they're the reincarnation of Lloyd Bentsen.  Might not even happen there, because a Presidential election makes it even harder.

It would actually be very reminiscent of New Jersey this year, come to think of it.

Also, I think Louisiana will be a toss-up. Landrieu is very weak, and Hurricane Katrina made Louisiana slightly more Republican.

OTOH, I would call NJ at least Likely Democrat. Lautenberg would win in a walk as would any of potential replacements should he re-retire. His low approval ratings mean nothing; NJ gives everyone low approval ratings.

Not really.  If this was not the 2006 elections, the NJ race would have been a veritable toss-up.

Corruption does hurt.  And even in a banner Democratic year, which was especially strong in the NE, Menendez running as an incumbent still only got 53%.
The republican party in NJ is dead. Someone who they successfully painted as under federal criminal investigation won while coming from Hudson County and being hispanic. He was virtually unknown around the state until september. Lautenberg isnt corrupt and neither are any of the other NJ dem congressmen. That issue is over and NJ government has tons of time to enact popular laws and ethics bills. New Jersey for 2008 is likely to safe democratic. We know, we live here.
Logged
okstate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 383


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 09, 2006, 05:10:54 PM »

After reading more retirement rumors I have a lot of changes to make to what I posted.

I'll get around to it in the next few days.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 09, 2006, 05:43:10 PM »

Cornyn is not retiring and should at least be in Likely.  I mean, he'll never get over 60% unless the opponent is hapless, but it's just very hard for a Democrat to win 45% in Texas statewide nowadays, unless they're the reincarnation of Lloyd Bentsen.  Might not even happen there, because a Presidential election makes it even harder.

It would actually be very reminiscent of New Jersey this year, come to think of it.

Also, I think Louisiana will be a toss-up. Landrieu is very weak, and Hurricane Katrina made Louisiana slightly more Republican.

OTOH, I would call NJ at least Likely Democrat. Lautenberg would win in a walk as would any of potential replacements should he re-retire. His low approval ratings mean nothing; NJ gives everyone low approval ratings.

Not really.  If this was not the 2006 elections, the NJ race would have been a veritable toss-up.

Corruption does hurt.  And even in a banner Democratic year, which was especially strong in the NE, Menendez running as an incumbent still only got 53%.
The republican party in NJ is dead. Someone who they successfully painted as under federal criminal investigation won while coming from Hudson County and being hispanic. He was virtually unknown around the state until september. Lautenberg isnt corrupt and neither are any of the other NJ dem congressmen. That issue is over and NJ government has tons of time to enact popular laws and ethics bills. New Jersey for 2008 is likely to safe democratic. We know, we live here.

Saying like corruption doesn't exist in New Jersey (with Menendez too) is like saying that the federal government under Republicans the last four years hasn't been spending like drunken sailors.

Just because you want to divorce yourself from reality and use the "I know New Jersey because I live here" isn't going to cut it.

Also, I would advise not predicting New Jersey for 2008 before it happens.
Logged
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 09, 2006, 07:15:27 PM »

She is taking a beating, but besides throwing all that money at Chafee, I am not sure what she could have done differently.  It was a brutal cycle for the job.  She couldnt duct tape George Allen's mouth shut, couldnt keep Conrad Burns from insulting firefighters, or couldnt keep Bob Taft from destroying the career of Mike DeWine. 

Pete Ricketts
Susan Harris
Mike McGavick
Mark Kennedy
Dwight Grotberg

Nebraska, Florida, Washington, Minnesota, and North Dakota were some real oppurtunities for the Republican party this year and this is the best they could do? When your party is in the majority and the majority of senate candidates up for reelection are in the minority party, that's called an oppurtunity. To top things off, you not only do not gain more seats and give your party a real mandate, you lose your advantage as the majority alltogether. .


Here in Ohio a guy named Jim Petro, the state auditor, ran for Governor and tried to win the nomination. I think he could have made trouble for Strickland, more so than Blackwell. Lynn Swann may have looked like a winner at the time, but no one looked closer at what kind of campaign he would run against one of the more vulnerable governors? I would also figure if the Republican candidate was breathing in Kansas or Oklahoma, that person would have an immediate advantage over their Democratic counterpart. Neither of these races were even close. I could go on all night about disaster after disaster in Governors, Senators, and Congressional candidates this year.

This is not a new thing, either. Many are familiar with key elections in Illinois and Washington two years ago not to mention the 2 governor's races last year. I don't expect them to win all of these elections, but at least make it competitive and give your constiuents the idea you're trying. Maybe this year was a bad year to be a Republican, but when your campaigns are that bad and you lose decisive control overnight, something's radically wrong.

Mrs. Dole, all these things put together=a rotten job as head of the NRSC.

Mark Kennedy was a good candidate in a bad year......DOle couldnt make anyone run if they didnt want to...they saw the environment and what could happen.  They tried to prevent Harris from running, but she ran anyways.  No Repiblican would have beat Ben Nelson, and no Republican would have beaten Cantwell this year.  I am glad Rossi didnt run so he can run for us another time either for Senate or Gov.  Kent Conrad wasnt going to lose anyways.

Repiblicans would be stupid to target NJ in 2008.  How many times can we waste money there?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.243 seconds with 12 queries.