Will cross-state migration affect voting trends?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 05:19:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Will cross-state migration affect voting trends?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will cross-state migration affect voting trends?  (Read 694 times)
AltWorlder
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: 3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 05, 2021, 08:20:38 PM »

https://www.unitedvanlines.com/newsroom/movers-study-2020


Quote
ST. LOUIS – Jan. 4, 2021 – United Van Lines today released the company’s 44th Annual National Migration Study, revealing in 2020, Americans continued to move westbound and southbound – and the COVID-19 pandemic factored into and accelerated many of those decisions to move.

According to the study, which tracks the company’s exclusive data for customers’ 2020 state-to-state migration patterns, Idaho was the state with the highest percentage of inbound migration (70%) among states experiencing more than 250 moves* with United Van Lines for the second consecutive year. Topping the list of outbound locations was New Jersey (70% outbound), which has held the spot for the past three years.

Among the top inbound states were South Carolina (64%), Oregon (63%), South Dakota (62%) and Arizona (62%), while New York (67%), Illinois (67%), Connecticut (63%) and California (59%) were among the states experiencing the largest exoduses.

United Van Lines also conducts a survey examining the reasons behind Americans’ migration patterns as a companion to the study’s findings. This year’s survey results indicated 40% of Americans who moved did so for a new job or job transfer (down from prior years), and more than one in four (27%) moved to be closer to family (which is significantly up over prior years).

Quote
For retirement, Delaware experienced more inbound moves than any other state at 41%, followed by Florida (39%) and South Carolina (38.5%). Minnesota led the list of states people moved to for family (41%), and Wyoming was the top state for a lifestyle change with an inbound percentage upwards of 29. More people migrated to Nebraska (72%) for a new job or job transfer than any other state, and more people moved to Idaho (11%) due to the cost of living than any other state.

Throughout the pandemic in 2020, major metropolitan areas and hotspots, such as New York City (72%), Newark (72%) and Chicago (69%), experienced greater outbound migration, while lower-density cities like Wilmington, North Carolina (79%) and Boise, Idaho (75%) saw high levels of inbound moves.

Quote
The top inbound states (with 250 moves or more) of 2020 were:

Idaho
South Carolina
Oregon
South Dakota
Arizona
North Carolina
Tennessee
Alabama
Florida
Arkansas
New to the 2020 top inbound list are Tennessee at No. 7 and Alabama at No. 8, both with inbound percentages of 60, and Arkansas at No. 10 with 59% inbound.

Quote
The top outbound states for 2020 were:

New Jersey
New York
Illinois 
Connecticut
California
Kansas
North Dakota
Massachusetts
Ohio
Maryland

Quote
Several states saw nearly the same number of residents moving inbound as outbound. New Hampshire and Montana are among these “balanced states.”
Logged
PSOL
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2021, 09:04:18 PM »

I believe new migrants to plain states like the Dakotas, Wyoming, Montana, and especially of note Idaho have mainly white, middle income people and retirees come into the state which is a factor of why they trend so Republican.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,809


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2021, 12:09:31 AM »

In our growingly polarized times, don't count the number of "political refugees" moving from blue states to red states or vice versa because of politics.  It may sometimes be conscious, but it can also be an unconscious cultural preference too.  Plus, I imagine that this was hastened in 2020 by "covid refugees" from states with heavy restrictions wanting to live a relatively normal life and going to a state with few restrictions.
Logged
Samof94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,429
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2021, 07:19:36 AM »

In our growingly polarized times, don't count the number of "political refugees" moving from blue states to red states or vice versa because of politics.  It may sometimes be conscious, but it can also be an unconscious cultural preference too.  Plus, I imagine that this was hastened in 2020 by "covid refugees" from states with heavy restrictions wanting to live a relatively normal life and going to a state with few restrictions.
Kansas lost people despite being a red state. Then again, economics was an issue with it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 10 queries.