States candidates will win no matter what

[Non Swing Voter]

That's a pretty good map of the fairly safe states.  But I agree with others that Iowa and Ohio are not in the "no matter what" column.  I suspect that map gives Biden many more electoral votes than Trump.

[Ferguson97]

Biden: California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, New Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, DC, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine CD-1, Maine-at-large, Hawaii (total 199 EV)

Trump: Utah, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska-at-large, NE-01, NE-03, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia, Indiana (total 125 EV)

[Grassroots]

This thread is for your solid states not a full on ranking you imbecile.
290 to 248

[LAKISYLVANIA]

[TiltsAreUnderrated]

Darker colouring indicates states are states that would have been safe with any matchup or different but realistic environment in 2020. MA depends on the Republican nominee being Charlie Baker.

Edit: UT also belongs in the 'safe, but not titanium' category, but only in the event of a strong third-party challenge that disproportionately hurts Republicans there.

[Ferguson97]

Darker colouring indicates states are states that would have been safe with any matchup or different but realistic environment in 2020. MA depends on the Republican nominee being Charlie Baker.

Edit: UT also belongs in the 'safe, but not titanium' category, but only in the event of a strong third-party challenge that disproportionately hurts Republicans there.

I'd swap CO and NM.

[538Electoral]

Realistic:

Absolute:

[kph14]

Except for ME-1, "realistic" is a good map

Realistic:

Absolute: