NH Boston Globe/Suffolk Poll - Sanders 16, Biden 15. 24% undecideds

[Queen Isuelt]

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/01/21/metro/read-full-results-suffolkglobe-nh-poll/?s_campaign=breakingnews:newsletter

https://twitter.com/ElectionsIndex/status/1219591219954769925

https://twitter.com/ActorAaronBooth/status/1219603417817145344

Suffolk never pushes undecideds

[Eraserhead]

The most notable thing here is probably that Warren's support among men essentially evaporated.

[Queen Isuelt]

The most notable thing here is probably that Warren's support among men essentially evaporated.

Suffolk doesnt even push refusals lol 119/500 are undecided.

[Skye]

24% undecided... Jesus, Suffolk.

[ElectionsGuy]

So many junk polls in the last week.

[Terry the Fat Shark]

I believe this may be another qualifying poll for Yang?

[Cinemark]

I believe this may be another qualifying poll for Yang?

Nope. Only USAToday/Suffolk counts towards qualification.

[OneJ]

Around a quarter undecided? Junk it is.

[bilaps]

Who did worse than expected at the debate last week

Warren 21%
Biden 17%
Sanders 9%

But CNN and Nate Silver said Warren won the debate

[Cinemark]

Who did worse than expected at the debate last week

Warren 21%
Biden 17%
Sanders 9%

But CNN and Nate Silver said Warren won the debate

Yes, because thats what Ipsos found. Nate Silver doesnt make sh**t up to hurt Bernie.

[Sir Mohamed]

#Everyoneunder17

With 1 in 4 undecided, hardly means anything. But not a great poll for Sanders, who should be favored in NH.

[Morning in Atlas]

lol

[Crumpets]

New Hampshire is known for swinging wildly at the last minute in national primary elections, so I don't think 24% undecided is ridiculous for now.

[Zaybay]

Who did worse than expected at the debate last week

Warren 21%
Biden 17%
Sanders 9%

But CNN and Nate Silver said Warren won the debate

Yes, because thats what Ipsos found. Nate Silver doesnt make sh**t up to hurt Bernie.

Its possible what happened, if this poll is to be believed, is that opinion shifted about the debate.

The Ipsos poll was taken immediately after the debate was over, and for those people Warren was clearly the winner. But the electorate has also been exposed to the drama of the handshake, the controversy that started the whole thing, etc. and that may have shifted the view on the debate.

This entire theory is only valid if Warren continues to rate poorly from the debate, however.

[Sorenroy]

Change is from their previous poll two months ago.

Sanders — 16% (±0)
Biden — 15% (+3%)
Buttigieg — 12% (-1%)
Warren — 10% (-4%)
Yang — 6% (+2%)
Gabbard — 5% (-1%)
Klobuchar — 5% (+4%)
Steyer — 3% (+1%)
Bennet — 1% (+1%)
Patrick — 1% (±0)
Delaney — 0% (-1%)

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/01/21/metro/read-full-results-suffolkglobe-nh-poll/

[Adam Griffin]

White people are equivocal in politics, and NH is 90% white. They're the only reason this primary has been in as much "flux" as it has been, or else the nominee would've been definitively decided 2 years ago. It actually wouldn't surprise me if 1 in 4 likely voters in NH could legitimately be flipped at this point, but credible polling that pushes voters wouldn't show such a result, so...

[ProudModerate2]

This is NOT a good poll for Sanders.
He should be leading comfortably in New Hampshire, and at this close proximity to the voting in this state.
The changes from the previous poll, also shows no movement for Bernie and a gain by Biden.

[bilaps]

This is NOT a good poll for Sanders.
He should be leading comfortably for New Hampshire, and at this close proximity to the voting in this state.
The changes from the previous poll, also shows no movement for Bernie and a gain by Biden.

Keep telling yourself that.

[DrScholl]

The primary will be over earlier than previously thought.

[ProudModerate2]

This is NOT a good poll for Sanders.
He should be leading comfortably in New Hampshire, and at this close proximity to the voting in this state.
The changes from the previous poll, also shows no movement for Bernie and a gain by Biden.

Keep telling yourself that.

LOL.
If you are saying you disagree with something I said, what exactly is that? Please explain.

[bilaps]

This is NOT a good poll for Sanders.
He should be leading comfortably in New Hampshire, and at this close proximity to the voting in this state.
The changes from the previous poll, also shows no movement for Bernie and a gain by Biden.

Keep telling yourself that.

LOL.
If you are saying you disagree with something I said, what exactly is that? Please explain.

Ok, I'll try even though I know there's no point. Silly me.

Poll in which Sanders leading is somehow bad for him. You see him stagnant but Biden is up by incredible 3%. Warren is down 4% which could only benefit Bernie, but you ignore that. It's easier like that. Only thing this poll shows is that it's a tight race and that IA will have huge impact, nothing what already we didn't know. A lot of undecideds and a lot of people who have said they could change their mind. But only thing you see is a bad poll for Sanders, that's for LOL

[Interlocutor is just not there yet]

So many junk polls in the last week.

More like the last 4 years.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Biden is gonna sweep the primary

[ProudModerate2]

This is NOT a good poll for Sanders.
He should be leading comfortably in New Hampshire, and at this close proximity to the voting in this state.
The changes from the previous poll, also shows no movement for Bernie and a gain by Biden.

Keep telling yourself that.

LOL.
If you are saying you disagree with something I said, what exactly is that? Please explain.

Ok, I'll try even though I know there's no point. Silly me.

Poll in which Sanders leading is somehow bad for him. You see him stagnant but Biden is up by incredible 3%. Warren is down 4% which could only benefit Bernie, but you ignore that. It's easier like that. Only thing this poll shows is that it's a tight race and that IA will have huge impact, nothing what already we didn't know. A lot of undecideds and a lot of people who have said they could change their mind. But only thing you see is a bad poll for Sanders, that's for LOL

You used the word "bad" twice in your response and claim that I said that, but I never used that word.
I didn't say Biden's 3% increase was "incredible."
A decline in Warren's number could benefit Sanders, but it doesn't show here. It may have gone to a number of other candidates.
It is a tight race, and I didn't indicate it wasn't or that anyone was assured to win in NH.
Yes, there is "a lot of undecided and a lot of people who have said they could change their mind," but I never refuted this.

I just made a couple of points, and it just seems you are triggered for some odd reason.