WI-Marquette: Biden 28, Sanders 20, Warren 17, Buttigieg 6, Harris 3, Yang 2

[Gass3268]

These are responses to who your "first choice" is:

Biden 28%
Sanders 20%
Warren 17%
Buttigieg 6%
Harris 3%
Yang 2%
Booker 1%
All others are 1% or less

Will provide source once able.

https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1169301403996753921

[Thunder98]

Harris at 3%, lol

She needs to do something to improve those numbers soon or her campaign is doomed.

[Zaybay]

Interesting that only Yang saw growth, while Sanders, Booker, and Harris took large dives.

[JG]

From the numbers, it looks like there are much more undecideds than there were in April?

[Tender Branson]

From the numbers, it looks like there are much more undecideds than there were in April?

Yes, people are shifting into "Let's wait and see"-mode ...

[Comrade Funk]

https://twitter.com/ActorAaronBooth/status/1169304703953461251

So all in all, excellent momentum for Warren.

[President Johnson]

But Wisconsin was a progressive stronghold Uncle Joe has zero chance?

[Landslide Lyndon]

LOL Sanders.

[Eraserhead]

The last poll was done so long ago that Biden wasn't even in the race yet.

LOL Sanders.

LOL still ahead of Warren though.

[eric82oslo]

https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1169301403996753921

Basically everyone - including Beto - are shrinking (massively) or staying the same, except for Yang?

[eric82oslo]

From the numbers, it looks like there are much more undecideds than there were in April?

Yes, people are shifting into "Let's wait and see"-mode ...

Which can only be great for X factors normally way outside the box like Yang.

[Rookie Yinzer]

But Wisconsin was a progressive stronghold Uncle Joe has zero chance?

Joe Biden is not going to win Wisconsin if it’s a binary race when they vote.

[ProudModerate2]

But Wisconsin was a progressive stronghold Uncle Joe has zero chance?

I'm a bit shocked by the numbers also.
If Bernie or Warren are not leading in Wisconsin now, it could be a bad sign for them down the road.

[eric82oslo]

But Wisconsin was a progressive stronghold Uncle Joe has zero chance?

I'm a bit shocked by the numbers also.
If Bernie or Warren are not leading in Wisconsin now, it could be a bad sign for them down the road.

Ever heard of Biden fatigue?

This is a prime example of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZnTtOwwLIs

Most Americans won't want to exchange one president whose mind is hardly working at all (windmills cause cancer, nuke hurricanes) with another one who gets absolutely every detail wrong every time. What Americans have shown in every presidential election for the past 20-30 years at least, is that they want the exact opposite of the guy currently in charge. Biden is basically Trump 2.0. Maybe an upgrade, but in no way the dramatic, altering change that most Americans are dying to see.

[ProudModerate2]

But Wisconsin was a progressive stronghold Uncle Joe has zero chance?

I'm a bit shocked by the numbers also.
If Bernie or Warren are not leading in Wisconsin now, it could be a bad sign for them down the road.

Ever heard of Biden fatigue?

This is a prime example of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZnTtOwwLIs

Most Americans won't want to exchange one president whose mind is hardly working at all (windmills cause cancer, nuke hurricanes) with another one who gets absolutely every detail wrong every time. What Americans have shown in every presidential election for the past 20-30 years at least, is that they want the exact opposite of the guy currently in charge. Biden is basically Trump 2.0. Maybe an upgrade, but in no way the dramatic, altering change that most Americans are dying to see.

Ever heard of the "eric82oslo singing Yang" fatigue?
It's becoming more and more, annoyingly prevalent in Atlas.

[Eraserhead]

So wait... was Booker actually at 9% in their April poll?

[Gracile]

Harris' recent numbers have been pretty bad across the board.

I think the Biden support might be a bit overestimated.

[eric82oslo]

But Wisconsin was a progressive stronghold Uncle Joe has zero chance?

I'm a bit shocked by the numbers also.
If Bernie or Warren are not leading in Wisconsin now, it could be a bad sign for them down the road.

Ever heard of Biden fatigue?

This is a prime example of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZnTtOwwLIs

Most Americans won't want to exchange one president whose mind is hardly working at all (windmills cause cancer, nuke hurricanes) with another one who gets absolutely every detail wrong every time. What Americans have shown in every presidential election for the past 20-30 years at least, is that they want the exact opposite of the guy currently in charge. Biden is basically Trump 2.0. Maybe an upgrade, but in no way the dramatic, altering change that most Americans are dying to see.

Ever heard of the "eric82oslo singing Yang" fatigue?
It's becoming more and more, annoyingly prevalent in Atlas.

Did you even watch the video I linked to? I guess not.
Otherwise you would never in a million days have written the words you just did.
The video is literally appalling and shocking in every way humanly possible. You really thing that is the best thing the collective human mind of US of A can do in the year 2020? I happen to think not, I have that high thoughts of what America already is and what it can become in the future.

[SN2903]

LOL Sanders.

Harris is doing a lot worse

[Gass3268]

But Wisconsin was a progressive stronghold Uncle Joe has zero chance?

Joe Biden is not going to win Wisconsin if it’s a binary race when they vote.

Which it in all likelihood will be by April.

[Landslide Lyndon]

LOL Sanders.

Harris is doing a lot worse

Your point being?

[Mr. Morden]

So wait... was Booker actually at 9% in their April poll?

Not exactly.  To quote the tweet that Comrade Funk posted:

This is the first time they appear to have done a true ballot test though.  Previously they just asked if they were “a top choice”, this one appears to be THE “top choice.” Previously respondents could pick more than one. This one *sounds like* it only allowed one 1st choice.

Therefore, the previous polls were just about whether you were considering the candidate or not, so it added up to more than 100%.

[Eraserhead]

Ah, that's right. This just makes looking at the supposed changes from poll to poll even less relevant.