Laura Loomer banned from Twitter

[Doimper]

Twitter bans Jewish lady for correctly calling a BDS supporter anti-Jewish.

The perpetual victims.

Don't think this Nazi will last long on Atlas.

^ "Everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi!" Typical leftist.

There's something satisfying about watching the nuts get ideologically outflanked by even bigger nuts

[UncleSam]

I'm sure that this woman posted ban-worthy stuff on Twitter.

If an elected official is a proponent of Sharia Law, that IS a legitimate issue for discussion.  It's not too much to require an elected official to publicly state that Sharia Law has no place whatsoever in American Law and Jurisprudence.  If an elected official cannot, or will not, make such a proclamation, I'll not vote for that person, even if they promise me Cadillac Healthcare for life.

It's a completely superfluous proclamation.

Do you also consider Trump being asked to denounce the KKK superfluous? I’m assuming you do not but the requirement is comparable.

[Karpatsky]

I'm sure that this woman posted ban-worthy stuff on Twitter.

If an elected official is a proponent of Sharia Law, that IS a legitimate issue for discussion.  It's not too much to require an elected official to publicly state that Sharia Law has no place whatsoever in American Law and Jurisprudence.  If an elected official cannot, or will not, make such a proclamation, I'll not vote for that person, even if they promise me Cadillac Healthcare for life.

It's a completely superfluous proclamation.

Do you also consider Trump being asked to denounce the KKK superfluous? I’m assuming you do not but the requirement is comparable.

Trump was endorsed by David Duke. I would expect a U.S. politician endorsed by the Taliban to reject the endorsement.

[Fuzzy Bear]

I'm sure that this woman posted ban-worthy stuff on Twitter.

If an elected official is a proponent of Sharia Law, that IS a legitimate issue for discussion.  It's not too much to require an elected official to publicly state that Sharia Law has no place whatsoever in American Law and Jurisprudence.  If an elected official cannot, or will not, make such a proclamation, I'll not vote for that person, even if they promise me Cadillac Healthcare for life.

It's a completely superfluous proclamation.

Do you also consider Trump being asked to denounce the KKK superfluous? I’m assuming you do not but the requirement is comparable.

Trump was endorsed by David Duke. I would expect a U.S. politician endorsed by the Taliban to reject the endorsement.

Trump did repudiate Duke's endorsement.  The media, however, wouldn't stop bringing it up.

Lots of morons of all stripes make unsolicited endorsements of candidates.  Trump never solicited Duke's endorsement, and repudiated it.  The media, however, was less accommodating with Trump than they were with Obama and Bill Ayres.

[libertpaulian]

Laura Loomer doesn't need to be banned from Twitter.

She needs to be committed to a state hospital.

[pbrower2a]

Could there be anything more hypocritical than a Jewish racist?

Considering that highly-systematized racism was the basis of the Holocaust, I would think that any expression of racism would be about as repugnant to a Jew as putting one's fingers into sulfuric acid if one were both a chemist and a pianist.   

[ProudModerate2]

Could there be anything more hypocritical than a Jewish racist?

Considering that highly-systematized racism was the basis of the Holocaust, I would think that any expression of racism would be about as repugnant to a Jew as putting one's fingers into sulfuric acid if one were both a chemist and a pianist.   

And yet DavidB, who has told this forum of his Jewish faith, is the first poster to actually quickly defend this Looney Bigot in this very thread.
I dont get it ..... I just dont get it.
Can someone please explain this to me?

[pbrower2a]

Could there be anything more hypocritical than a Jewish racist?

Considering that highly-systematized racism was the basis of the Holocaust, I would think that any expression of racism would be about as repugnant to a Jew as putting one's fingers into sulfuric acid if one were both a chemist and a pianist.   

And yet DavidB, who has told this forum of his Jewish faith, is the first poster to actually quickly defend this Looney Bigot in this very thread.
I dont get it ..... I just don't get it.
Can someone please explain this to me?

I can't explain a specific case. I am not Jewish.

[Brittain33]

Trump did repudiate Duke's endorsement.  The media, however, wouldn't stop bringing it up.

Probably because he refused to repudiate David Duke until he was asked many, many times, then he did a hand-wavey repudiation that didn't talk about the issues, and then his behavior showed he didn't care because he said that there were "very fine people on both sides" at Charlottesville at that catastrophic press conference where he flaunted his sympathies for the KKK and alt-right.

Repudiation only "sticks" if you a) mean it and b) actually change your behavior where you appealed to them and supported them. Trump did neither because he never changes and never grows.

[Badger]

Twitter bans Jewish lady for correctly calling a BDS supporter anti-Jewish.

The perpetual victims.

Don't think this Nazi will last long on Atlas.

^ "Everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi!" Typical leftist.

DavidB actually loves Nazis to own the libs.

David is write about the new Nazi poster, and Lyndon is correct about David. Small world

[Badger]

Twitter bans Jewish lady for correctly calling a BDS supporter anti-Jewish.

Twitter bans self-hating jewish lady who uses her Jewishness to give cover to far-right lunatics.


There are normal people who oppose BDS effectively. She will never be one of them.

Superbly put.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Twitter bans Jewish lady for correctly calling a BDS supporter anti-Jewish.

The perpetual victims.

Don't think this Nazi will last long on Atlas.

^ "Everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi!" Typical leftist.

DavidB actually loves Nazis to own the libs.

DavidB YaBB God ★★★★★ Posts: 10,818

Re: Germany's crackdown on the left continues « Reply #1438 on: March 27, 1933, 07:45:48 pm »Even more winning!

[Badger]

Trump did repudiate Duke's endorsement.  The media, however, wouldn't stop bringing it up.

Probably because he refused to repudiate David Duke until he was asked many, many times, then he did a hand-wavey repudiation that didn't talk about the issues, and then his behavior showed he didn't care because he said that there were "very fine people on both sides" at Charlottesville at that catastrophic press conference where he flaunted his sympathies for the KKK and alt-right.

Repudiation only "sticks" if you a) mean it and b) actually change your behavior where you appealed to them and supported them. Trump did neither because he never changes and never grows.

Even more telling, although several years earlier he went on in great detail about leaving the Reform Party because of people like David Duke taking it over, and discussed Duke insufficient detail that left no doubt that he knew who David Duke was oh, he then when pressed on Dukes endorsement claimed he never heard of David Duke. A complete bald-faced unmitigated lie. Why else would he do that except he was unwilling to repudiate someone who supported him. Part of it as a dog whistle 2 racist, and part of it because he is just pathologically, psychologically, narcissistically incapable of repudiating even the lowest of the low as long as they still support him.

[ProudModerate2]

Trump did repudiate Duke's endorsement.  The media, however, wouldn't stop bringing it up.

Probably because he refused to repudiate David Duke until he was asked many, many times, then he did a hand-wavey repudiation that didn't talk about the issues, and then his behavior showed he didn't care because he said that there were "very fine people on both sides" at Charlottesville at that catastrophic press conference where he flaunted his sympathies for the KKK and alt-right.

Repudiation only "sticks" if you a) mean it and b) actually change your behavior where you appealed to them and supported them. Trump did neither because he never changes and never grows.

Even more telling, although several years earlier he went on in great detail about leaving the Reform Party because of people like David Duke taking it over, and discussed Duke insufficient detail that left no doubt that he knew who David Duke was oh, he then when pressed on Dukes endorsement claimed he never heard of David Duke. A complete bald-faced unmitigated lie. Why else would he do that except he was unwilling to repudiate someone who supported him. Part of it as a dog whistle 2 racist, and part of it because he is just pathologically, psychologically, narcissistically incapable of repudiating even the lowest of the low as long as they still support him.

And yet someone like Fuzzy, does not understand why "the media would not stop bringing it up."
How dare the media disclose these facts?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

And now PayPal!

https://www.newsweek.com/paypal-bans-pro-trump-anti-muslim-fanatic-laura-loomer-1319563

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Loomer is a whacko. A high energy whacko to be exact.

[dead0man]

Trump did repudiate Duke's endorsement.  The media, however, wouldn't stop bringing it up.

Probably because he refused to repudiate David Duke until he was asked many, many times, then he did a hand-wavey repudiation that didn't talk about the issues, and then his behavior showed he didn't care because he said that there were "very fine people on both sides" at Charlottesville at that catastrophic press conference where he flaunted his sympathies for the KKK and alt-right.

Repudiation only "sticks" if you a) mean it and b) actually change your behavior where you appealed to them and supported them. Trump did neither because he never changes and never grows.

indeed.  This exact same issue (failing to repudiate racists they are associated with) is what killed the Women's March.