Congressman asks why white supremacists are offensive
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:17:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Congressman asks why white supremacists are offensive
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Congressman asks why white supremacists are offensive  (Read 2741 times)
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,539
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: January 12, 2019, 06:11:32 PM »

Your liberal media at work: Part 854535





42 seconds total coverage on Fox about Kings embracement of white supremacy. LOL!

And it was framed as “Steve King defending himself today from an attack by the New York Times...”

What a Deplorable news source. Unbelievable!
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,464
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: January 12, 2019, 10:22:48 PM »

Your liberal media at work: Part 854535





42 seconds total coverage on Fox about Kings embracement of white supremacy. LOL!

And it was framed as “Steve King defending himself today from an attack by the New York Times...”

Of course it was. Why did I ever expect otherwise? Roll Eyes
Logged
Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,985
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: January 13, 2019, 10:35:31 PM »

Your liberal media at work: Part 854535





42 seconds total coverage on Fox about Kings embracement of white supremacy. LOL!

And it was framed as “Steve King defending himself today from an attack by the New York Times...”

Of course it was. Why did I ever expect otherwise? Roll Eyes

How much time did the media spend on Trump's "s---hole countries" comment, compared to Tlaib's comment?

They both need to learn some self-control, obviously.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: January 13, 2019, 10:46:04 PM »

If this wasn't real it would be the most low-effort Onion article to write.

Whoever wrote it would get fired. The Onion is supposed to be funny.
Logged
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,536
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: January 13, 2019, 10:54:49 PM »

How much time did the media spend on Trump's "s---hole countries" comment, compared to Tlaib's comment?

They both need to learn some self-control, obviously.

I don't really get what the comparison is supposed to be here. "sh**thole countries" was a story because it gave insight into the mindset of the man with ultimate authority over our immigration policy and our foreign diplomacy - that's worth considerable coverage.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,539
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: January 14, 2019, 01:18:06 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Good for McCarthy to speak-out, though there is some doubt the House GOP will actually do anything.
And LOL at him for suggesting that the other side would do nothing if something like this happened with a Dem. He doesn't even recognize that the Nazis are with the GOP, not the Dem Party.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,464
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: January 14, 2019, 02:18:48 AM »

Your liberal media at work: Part 854535





42 seconds total coverage on Fox about Kings embracement of white supremacy. LOL!

And it was framed as “Steve King defending himself today from an attack by the New York Times...”

Of course it was. Why did I ever expect otherwise? Roll Eyes

How much time did the media spend on Trump's "s---hole countries" comment, compared to Tlaib's comment?

They both need to learn some self-control, obviously.

Not sure if this was your point, but there is one other Teensy difference. One is a backbench first term member of Congress, and the other is the freaking president of the United States of America. There is no conceivable basis on which both individual statement should be measured as somehow equally important, relevant, or newsworthy.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 12 queries.