What would the House vote have been if no one had an EC majority?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 12:51:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  What would the House vote have been if no one had an EC majority?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What would the House vote have been if no one had an EC majority?  (Read 1186 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 24, 2017, 11:11:58 AM »

Let's say the election result is the same except for three states: Clinton narrowly wins Michigan and Pennsylvania, and McMullin narrowly wins Utah.  In that case, I think the electoral college tally is:

Clinton 268
Trump 264
McMullin 6

So Clinton wins a plurality of the electoral college and a plurality of the popular vote, but not a majority of either.  So suppose there are no faithless electors, and the election goes to the House.  How many Republicans in the House would have bailed on Trump and voted McMullin?  Is there any chance of a deadlock in the House that leads to VP Pence being sworn in as acting president?

Bonus question: What if 4 of the 6 McMullin electors had strategically gone faithless and voted for someone like Paul Ryan instead?  Would more House Republicans have voted Ryan if he was an option, rather than vote for Trump?
Logged
60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED
ahugecat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 868


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2017, 01:56:23 AM »

House Republicans would have voted for Trump because if they didn't they'd get massacred in 2018.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,782


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2017, 04:14:27 AM »

It's the old House, not the new one that votes right?
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2017, 04:44:03 AM »

It's the old House, not the new one that votes right?

The new one.


It used to be the old one, until the debacle in 1800 where the Federalists who were defeated had to select the President.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,861


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2017, 04:51:38 AM »

It's the old House, not the new one that votes right?

The new one.


It used to be the old one, until the debacle in 1800 where the Federalists who were defeated had to select the President.

It was the the old one until the 1936 election. The Whigs used the fact the had congress for their crazy 1836 strategy.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,782


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2017, 06:16:41 AM »

So, 17 Democratic delegations, 32 Republican ones and 1 tied (Maine). So you'd need 7 GOP House delegations to jump ship. Seems like a tall order.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2017, 07:35:22 AM »

So, 17 Democratic delegations, 32 Republican ones and 1 tied (Maine). So you'd need 7 GOP House delegations to jump ship. Seems like a tall order.

Here’s a list of #NeverTrump Republicans in the House:

link

(Though I think they forgot a couple of names, like Reichert in WA.)  Some of them were retiring in 2016 though, so they wouldn’t be voting.  If all of them voted McMullin in the House, then what delegations does that move from Trump majority to no majority?  CO, FL, ID, MI, and WI?  That’s five.  Not listed though is any #NeverTrumpers among the incoming freshman members.  Not sure if there were any.

I’ve got to think that if it was a secret ballot, then tons of them would have voted McMullin in the House, in order to produce a deadlock that results in President Pence.  But their votes being public would have complicated things.

But keep in mind, in this scenario, Trump has lost both the popular vote *and* the electoral vote to Clinton, so he has absolutely no basis on which to claim a “mandate”.  That may lead some members to say “screw it, just bring on President Pence.”
Logged
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,375
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2017, 07:47:02 AM »

Bonus question: What if 4 of the 6 McMullin electors had strategically gone faithless and voted for someone like Paul Ryan instead?  Would more House Republicans have voted Ryan if he was an option, rather than vote for Trump?

What if 3 of the 6 McMullin electors had voted for Paul Ryan? Could the House have chosen between four different candidates?
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2017, 04:09:51 PM »

Trump would win of course.
Logged
Keep cool-idge
Benjamin Harrison he is w
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,770
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2017, 06:29:02 PM »

Okay what about this election
https://mobile.twitter.com/disneyfan2001/status/923689972414025728/photo/1
What this election is Gary Johnson gets on the debate stage an does really well it gives him New Mexico and 8-10% of the popular vote
McMullin gets 3% so he takes you Utah

What happens is that he takes Enough votes in Arizona and Nevada away from trump giving those states to Hillary

Colorado goes for trump because Gary Johnson takes a lot democrat leaning voters and also mcmullin is not on the ballot.

Virginia goes trump because Gary takes enough voters in NOVA and Charlottesville to give trump a razor thin margin.

Florida goes for Hillary because mcmullin is on the ballot and he takes 15% in southern Florida aka he takes half of the republican vote there trump only gets like 15% in dade county.

Minnesota goes for trump because mcmullin isn’t on the ballot and Johnson takes a lot in twin cities area.

Pennsylvania and Michigan hillary increases black turnout and in the Philadelphia suburbs Gary Johnson gets 9% of the vote taking a lot of reluctant trump voters

New Hampshire and Maine flip republican cause those states are Gary Johnson’s second and fourth best states in the country.

The popular vote is 41% Clinton and 42% trump who wins?
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,782
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2017, 08:51:49 PM »

So, 17 Democratic delegations, 32 Republican ones and 1 tied (Maine). So you'd need 7 GOP House delegations to jump ship. Seems like a tall order.

Here’s a list of #NeverTrump Republicans in the House:

link

(Though I think they forgot a couple of names, like Reichert in WA.)  Some of them were retiring in 2016 though, so they wouldn’t be voting.  If all of them voted McMullin in the House, then what delegations does that move from Trump majority to no majority?  CO, FL, ID, MI, and WI?  That’s five.  Not listed though is any #NeverTrumpers among the incoming freshman members.  Not sure if there were any.

I’ve got to think that if it was a secret ballot, then tons of them would have voted McMullin in the House, in order to produce a deadlock that results in President Pence.  But their votes being public would have complicated things.

But keep in mind, in this scenario, Trump has lost both the popular vote *and* the electoral vote to Clinton, so he has absolutely no basis on which to claim a “mandate”.  That may lead some members to say “screw it, just bring on President Pence.”


The President Pence scenario would also leave the risk that if the Democrats had a big enough 2018 wave, the House could still elect Clinton president in Jan. 2019 boot Pence back to VP.  Now, it would probably take a 60D/35R generic ballot to give the Democrats outright control of 26 state delegations, but that would be handing them a heck of an issue to motivate base turnout, particularly with Clinton having won the PV.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2017, 09:05:01 PM »

So, 17 Democratic delegations, 32 Republican ones and 1 tied (Maine). So you'd need 7 GOP House delegations to jump ship. Seems like a tall order.

Here’s a list of #NeverTrump Republicans in the House:

link

(Though I think they forgot a couple of names, like Reichert in WA.)  Some of them were retiring in 2016 though, so they wouldn’t be voting.  If all of them voted McMullin in the House, then what delegations does that move from Trump majority to no majority?  CO, FL, ID, MI, and WI?  That’s five.  Not listed though is any #NeverTrumpers among the incoming freshman members.  Not sure if there were any.

I’ve got to think that if it was a secret ballot, then tons of them would have voted McMullin in the House, in order to produce a deadlock that results in President Pence.  But their votes being public would have complicated things.

But keep in mind, in this scenario, Trump has lost both the popular vote *and* the electoral vote to Clinton, so he has absolutely no basis on which to claim a “mandate”.  That may lead some members to say “screw it, just bring on President Pence.”


The President Pence scenario would also leave the risk that if the Democrats had a big enough 2018 wave, the House could still elect Clinton president in Jan. 2019 boot Pence back to VP.  Now, it would probably take a 60D/35R generic ballot to give the Democrats outright control of 26 state delegations, but that would be handing them a heck of an issue to motivate base turnout, particularly with Clinton having won the PV.

If the Dems win that big in the 2018 midterms, then couldn't the lame duck Republican House just hold a re-vote in November or December 2018, and vote in either Trump or McMullin in order to stop Clinton from becoming president?
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2017, 05:25:59 PM »

I think the most optimistic scenario for Clinton includes winning MI/FL/WI/CO/VA, but that's a big stretch and even that wouldn't be enough to put her over the top. I don't know if I see McMullin winning anything, except for UT or ID if he's lucky.



So this is Clinton's best scenario IMO, and Trump still gets 25 to her 23 and McMullin's 2.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2017, 05:50:57 PM »

I think the most optimistic scenario for Clinton includes winning MI/FL/WI/CO/VA

Wait, who wins a state in the House vote for POTUS if no one gets a majority of the delegation?  I figured you needed a majority of the delegation, but if it's just a plurality, then that changes things.  E.g., say Amash and Upton vote for McMullin, but all the other Republicans in Michigan vote Trump.  Then the Michigan delegation would be:

Trump 7
Clinton 5
McMullin 2

So does that count as Trump winning Michigan, because he's got a plurality, even though it's only 50% exactly and not a majority?  Or is it a null vote because of no majority?
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2017, 07:59:32 PM »

I think the most optimistic scenario for Clinton includes winning MI/FL/WI/CO/VA

Wait, who wins a state in the House vote for POTUS if no one gets a majority of the delegation?  I figured you needed a majority of the delegation, but if it's just a plurality, then that changes things.  E.g., say Amash and Upton vote for McMullin, but all the other Republicans in Michigan vote Trump.  Then the Michigan delegation would be:

Trump 7
Clinton 5
McMullin 2

So does that count as Trump winning Michigan, because he's got a plurality, even though it's only 50% exactly and not a majority?  Or is it a null vote because of no majority?

I believe that Trump would win Michigan in that scenario, but my scenario was extremely optimistic and included either abstentions of Amash/Upton or something along those lines (maybe a couple of the Never Trumpers could be persuaded into supporting Clinton, as extremely unlikely as that would be).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.238 seconds with 11 queries.