The "controversial" Super Bowl ads
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 11:31:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  The "controversial" Super Bowl ads		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: The "controversial" Super Bowl ads  (Read 949 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,103
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 06, 2017, 07:04:43 PM »
The second ad was superb.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 06, 2017, 09:38:54 PM »
Quote from: The David on February 06, 2017, 03:58:18 PM
As for the first one... more liberal tearjerker propaganda. Thanks, George Soros!

It was a bad ad, but Soros wasn't involved.  84 Lumber is a privately-held, family-owned company.
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 06, 2017, 11:30:32 PM »
The Budweiser ad was great, one of the best commercials I've seen in some time, the other one was eh.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,472
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 07, 2017, 12:34:12 AM »
Quote from: Horus on February 06, 2017, 11:30:32 PM
The Budweiser ad was great, one of the best commercials I've seen in some time, the other one was eh.

yeah, it was a great ad for a terrible product. Though I saw people on forums talking about how despite being big beer snobs it made them actually want to get a Bud.
Logged
IceAgeComing
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,582
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 07, 2017, 03:30:58 AM »
Quote from: Santander on February 06, 2017, 03:47:29 PM
Budweiser went from America cans to this cuckoldry?
Damn Walloons! (I realize InBev is headquartered in Flanders)

I was going to correct you since I've walked past an InBev office here in Brussels which technically isn't in Flanders but apparently that's a different division that focuses on Belgium rather than globally; and internationally they are based in Leuven just outside Brussels which is in Flanders.

Who on earth bases their company in bloody Leuven??
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 10 queries.