Sestak
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:00:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Sestak
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Sestak  (Read 1263 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,431
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 09, 2016, 02:33:13 AM »

He probably would've won. Looks like the wrong horse really was backed!
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,875


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2016, 05:32:14 AM »

Great job spending 7 digits in the primary to fulfill a 6 year old vendetta, DSCC.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,968
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2016, 10:21:31 PM »

McGinty was the Kay Hagen of this election cycle
Logged
TheElectoralBoobyPrize
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,537


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2016, 10:38:07 PM »

Yeah because a rematch worked so well for Feingold.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,968
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2016, 10:40:02 PM »

Lets face it, PA and OH and WI got 1 D and 1 R Casey and Toomey and Brown and Portman are entrenched senators.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,431
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2016, 10:41:31 PM »

Yeah because a rematch worked so well for Feingold.

Except Feingold was somewhat damaged and appeared hypocritical regarding his positions on campaigns, and in 2010 he had a really bad campaign.

Sestak lacked ALL of that type of baggage.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,931
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2016, 11:27:23 PM »

Yep, I'm 100% confident he would have won. In that alternate reality, Republicans could be held to a "Collins Majority" via the LA runoff.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2016, 02:24:15 AM »

He had a voting record unlike McGinty and they would've hit him on OCare hard but I do agree he would've won. Military background is HUGE in this day and age look at how close Kander came and Bel Edwards in LA, Ernst in IA etc.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,794
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2016, 10:25:25 AM »
« Edited: November 10, 2016, 10:49:09 AM by Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ »

I caved on McGinty but was certainly not happy about it. Sestak would have wrecked. McGinty couldn't even keep pace with Clinton in my neck of the city!
Logged
swf541
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2016, 10:42:36 AM »

I caved on McGinty was certainly not happy about it. Sestak would have wrecked. McGinty couldn't even keep pace with Clinton in my neck of the city!
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,628
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2016, 01:46:40 PM »

He really wouldn't. He would have been dragged down by Hillary's performance in PA too. Trump saved Toomey.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2016, 01:48:50 PM »

I don't see why people think he would have run ahead of Clinton.
Logged
swf541
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2016, 04:06:53 PM »

I don't see why people think he would have run ahead of Clinton.

He had more of an appeal to trump voters imo
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2016, 04:32:07 PM »

Sestak sounded like a lunatic at every debate. Dude had some spark in 2010, and he lost it by 2016. Sestak would've been embarrassed Ted Strickland-style.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,931
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 10, 2016, 10:55:04 PM »

My predictions for the alternate races:

Fetterman +4
Sestak +2

100% confident of both victories.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 10, 2016, 11:15:10 PM »

God I hate this forum.

This election proved one thing: If your Presidential candidate loses your state, you aren't winning the Senate seat. Governor races can be focused on local issues, and who the hell knows how Midterms are going to work going forward, but this is certain. Blue states elect blue senators, red states elect red senators. And this cycle, Pennsylvania was a red state.

Sestak does no better than McGinty. No better than Feingold. No better than Bayh.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,931
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 10, 2016, 11:36:22 PM »

God I hate this forum.

This election proved one thing: If your Presidential candidate loses your state, you aren't winning the Senate seat. Governor races can be focused on local issues, and who the hell knows how Midterms are going to work going forward, but this is certain. Blue states elect blue senators, red states elect red senators. And this cycle, Pennsylvania was a red state.

Sestak does no better than McGinty. No better than Feingold. No better than Bayh.

One election does not a trend make. Remember that 2012 elected Dem Senators in Montana, North Dakota, Missouri, Indiana, and West Virginia, and an R senator in Nevada. Yes, 2 of those were due to gaffes, but the other four were not.
Logged
Fight for Trump
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,044
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 11, 2016, 02:44:47 AM »

He was the better candidate, but there is no guarantee he would have won.
Logged
The Arizonan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,583
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 11, 2016, 03:12:50 AM »

God I hate this forum.

This election proved one thing: If your Presidential candidate loses your state, you aren't winning the Senate seat. Governor races can be focused on local issues, and who the hell knows how Midterms are going to work going forward, but this is certain. Blue states elect blue senators, red states elect red senators. And this cycle, Pennsylvania was a red state.

Sestak does no better than McGinty. No better than Feingold. No better than Bayh.

Remember that Dean Heller won in Nevada despite it being won by President Obama.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 11, 2016, 03:14:16 AM »

Honestly, it probably would've turned out the same. There wasn't much ticket-splitting at all in several of the swing states. We thought Trump was going to doom Toomey. He actually saved him.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 11 queries.