Emerson College predicts Clinton win 323-215 EV
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 05:20:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Emerson College predicts Clinton win 323-215 EV
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Emerson College predicts Clinton win 323-215 EV  (Read 735 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,154


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 07, 2016, 10:49:01 AM »

Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/304663-emerson-college-polling-predicts-electoral-landslide-for

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

They also predict a 50-50 Senate, with D pickups in IL, WI, MO, and PA (implying that they predict a D hold in NV).
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2016, 10:50:23 AM »

someone should tell them about their state polls.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2016, 10:50:46 AM »

Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/304663-emerson-college-polling-predicts-electoral-landslide-for

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

They also predict a 50-50 Senate, with D pickups in IL, WI, MO, and PA (implying that they predict a D hold in NV).

What the Heck?!
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2016, 10:50:48 AM »

Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/304663-emerson-college-polling-predicts-electoral-landslide-for

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

They also predict a 50-50 Senate, with D pickups in IL, WI, MO, and PA (implying that they predict a D hold in NV).

Seems very reasonable... almost blandly so. the MO pickup would be a nice surprise. I think Hassan has a real shot at NH too.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,287
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2016, 10:56:30 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Oh, how the definition of "landslide" must have changed.

Using that standard, the following elections were landslides too: 2012, 2008, 1996, 1992, 1988, 1980, 1972, 1964, 1956, 1952...
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,036
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2016, 11:01:49 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Oh, how the definition of "landslide" must have changed.

Using that standard, the following elections were landslides too: 2012, 2008, 1996, 1992, 1988, 1980, 1972, 1964, 1956, 1952...

In the EC, most of them were. Though I would consider 2012 as a “decent or decisive margin”, not a landslide (I say that would be 350+ EVs by today’s standards).
Logged
elcorazon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,402


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2016, 11:09:24 AM »

Sadly I think dems are going to lose senate. I predict pickups in PA, WI and IL and a hold in NV. Worried that Reps hold onto NH, MO, IN and NC. Hoping one or more of those swings to the dems.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2016, 11:12:51 AM »

If this is what Emerson is predicting, it could get ugly tomorrow.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,154


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2016, 11:19:21 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Oh, how the definition of "landslide" must have changed.

Using that standard, the following elections were landslides too: 2012, 2008, 1996, 1992, 1988, 1980, 1972, 1964, 1956, 1952...

Yeah, personally I think 1996 is probably the minimum standard for a landslide.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.221 seconds with 12 queries.