In which states would Sanders outperform Clinton the most/least?

[‼realJohnEwards‼]

It's widely believed among Sanders supporters that Sanders would be outperforming Clinton by a wide margin, particularly against Trump. Where would this be the most/least pronounced, in your opinion? Would he significantly underperform her anywhere?

[GeorgiaModerate]

Overperform? VT, OR, WA, possibly NH.  Underperform?  Any Southern state.

[Pyro]

Far stronger in the Industrial Midwest. Not sure if he'd be weaker anywhere, really.

[Bismarck]

I'm not sure about states, but Sanders would make the wealthy suburbs vote for Trump enthusiastically.

[Lief 🗽]

Over-perform: Maine, NH, Wisconsin, Nevada, Colorado, Iowa. Some states like Montana, Utah and Alaska may be on the fringe of competitive with Sanders.

Under-perform: Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida. States that are Lean R but potentially competitive now (GA, AZ, NE-02) would be out of reach for Sanders.

[Xing]

I think any differences would be relatively minor, since this country is very polarized, but anyway...

Overperform: AK, MT, UT, CO, IA, MN, WI, MI, VT, NH
Underperform: OH, PA, VA, NC, SC, GA, FL

[Shadows]

He would overperform her in every state vs Current Hillary. I am giving my views against a non-scam tainted seemingly dishonest Hillary, maybe Hillary 2008. Ofcourse, WA or VT, he would be incredibly strong.

He will sweep NH & CO with a 15% odd win. Coloradocare, the single payer on the ballot which is dumping Obamacare, is winning in every polls in double digits. Trump won't got 1 electoral college vote in Maine as well against Bernie.

WI, MN & MI, he will be very very strong & will be out of reach for Trump. I think he will perform much better in NC, Sanders won the NC White vote & cracked the 40% mark comfortably while doings so poor among the black vote. The Black vote is booked for the Dems anyways. He will be stronger in Nevada & Iowa too.

Underperform - Texas ( Maybe Florida & Ohio)

Similar - PA & OH