Libertarians and "true" Conservatives, an unholy alliance...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 07:28:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Libertarians and "true" Conservatives, an unholy alliance...
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Libertarians and "true" Conservatives, an unholy alliance...  (Read 1078 times)
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 26, 2005, 11:34:32 PM »

cummon, we gotta get in the milisecond that round 34 goes up to gain some immunity.  We have to make sure, one, we get a post, and two we get Truman off this round.  Ronald Reagan is at stake here and so is Grover Cleveland.  Another prospect to vote off next would be Abe Lincoln.  States and Sam Spade have been on this bandwagon (and me to a lesser extent) since Prez survivor started.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2005, 01:53:52 AM »

Lets stick with dump Lincoln for now.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2005, 12:32:58 PM »

The fact that the Republicans here have more respect for Reagan than Lincoln shows how far they've sunk (morally if not politically).

Apparently you feel it was more important to defeat a dying system of gov't (communism) than to actually free people from slavery.
Logged
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2005, 12:50:23 PM »
« Edited: May 27, 2005, 12:53:06 PM by Blue Rectangle »

The fact that the Republicans here have more respect for Reagan than Lincoln shows how far they've sunk (morally if not politically).

Apparently you feel it was more important to defeat a dying system of gov't (communism) than to actually free people from slavery.
If Lincoln had been president in 1985, he would have declared communism illegal in the USSR but not in the US Tongue

...and then he would have imprisoned all the communists in the US anyway.
Logged
Schmitz in 1972
Liberty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2005, 03:34:21 PM »

If Reagan goes this round I say we ought to put our differences aside and form a tri-partisan effort to nail Lincoln in round 34. If we don't send Lincoln packing soon, he could actually win this darn thing
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 27, 2005, 03:42:42 PM »

I bet you would like Grover Cleveland.  He was very pro-business his second term.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2005, 07:47:03 AM »

The fact that the Republicans here have more respect for Reagan than Lincoln shows how far they've sunk (morally if not politically).

Apparently you feel it was more important to defeat a dying system of gov't (communism) than to actually free people from slavery.
If Lincoln had been president in 1985, he would have declared communism illegal in the USSR but not in the US Tongue

...and then he would have imprisoned all the communists in the US anyway.

Touché
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.214 seconds with 13 queries.