Hillary Clinton may have committed election fraud

[Adam Griffin]

Hillary Clinton may have committed election fraud

This is really intriguing. It's apparently starting to circle about, but the evidence is less than flimsy, in my opinion.

One of the things I noticed that I didn't see stated was the striking similarity between the "Wonder Woman" commercial linked to in the article and the "FCKH8" commercials in terms of the style. The last minute or so of the Wonder Woman commercial in terms of style and tone definitely resembles some of the FCKH8 commercials' style (especially in tone and whatnot); hell, some of the same kid actors may be used. Nevertheless, that connection isn't really up for dispute.

It's kind of a long flow in terms of the explanation, but I'll summarize what I can:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's better if you just read it. It's disjointed but if you read from start to finish, it'll make a lot more sense. There's also a "Part 2" in the works as more analysis comes in.

[Adam Griffin]

So the "gist", I guess, is that Hillary Clinton's campaign possibly infused a PAC that's affiliated with FCKH8 et al with $300,000 to perform a false flag operation, attacking Trump (and possibly others?) and then pinning the blame on Bernie Sanders for doing it. Of course, if this was collusion, then it violates a pretty fycking important part of FEC rules. At least, that's my main takeaway. There may be more involved here; I'm going to keep reading.

[tik 🪀✨]

There isn't really a direct connection to Hillary as of yet but it is indeed quite a piece of work worth checking back on.

[Likely Voter]

Not sure I followed all of that but just so you know, campaigns can coordinate with Super PACs that only do work online, like Correct the Record.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/

And of course even if there were some violation, it would require the FEC to actually do something, which it clearly seems to have no interest in doing. When you look at how many of the GOP campaigns have designed themselves to work alongside super pacs and no one seems to give a crap. The only thing the FEC has done all year is ask Fiorina's Super PAC to change it's name. It was Carly for America and you can't have a candidate name in the PAC name, so they changed it to C.A.R.L.Y. for America.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

There's obviously some pretty shady false flag stuff here. However, there's two things about this article that I'm not following.

1. What is the connection between Luke Montgomery and Correct the Record?
2. Why is there a need to connect Correct the Record to another PAC? It is in direct coordination with Hillary's campaign.

[Adam Griffin]

Not sure I followed all of that but just so you know, campaigns can coordinate with Super PACs that only do work online, like Correct the Record.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/

And of course even if there were some violation, it would require the FEC to actually do something, which it clearly seems to have no interest in doing. When you look at how many of the GOP campaigns have designed themselves to work alongside super pacs and no one seems to give a crap. The only thing the FEC has done all year is ask Fiorina's Super PAC to change it's name. It was Carly for America and you can't have a candidate name in the PAC name, so they changed it to C.A.R.L.Y. for America.

Yes, that is a stipulation that I saw mentioned elsewhere and have seen before. However, does this apply when the organizations are essentially under an umbrella and are conducting activities in the physical realm (the Deport Racists stint tonight outside SNL)? I'm still trying to put together the dots myself.

There's obviously some pretty shady false flag stuff here. However, there's two things about this article that I'm not following.

1. What is the connection between Luke Montgomery and Correct the Record?
2. Why is there a need to connect Correct the Record to another PAC? It is in direct coordination with Hillary's campaign.

Yes, that's what I've been trying to determine. My guess is that some link was made in the "Server Sharing" section that has been redacted.

[Adam Griffin]

What I will say is that the first parts are interesting if there is no connection or nothing to hide here...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Negusa Nagast 🚀]

FEC Chair Ravel is on record saying that it will next difficult, if not downright impossible for the FEC to actually go after campaign finance law violations. Even if there was something sinister here, there would likely be no punishment other than electoral blowback.

[heatmaster]

So the "gist", I guess, is that Hillary Clinton's campaign possibly infused a PAC that's affiliated with FCKH8 et al with $300,000 to perform a false flag operation, attacking Trump (and possibly others?) and then pinning the blame on Bernie Sanders for doing it. Of course, if this was collusion, then it violates a pretty fycking important part of FEC rules. At least, that's my main takeaway. There may be more involved here; I'm going to keep reading.

If that old thing has been doing this,  bet she will be given a free pass on such "alleged shenanigans". How come the Clinton's standard for lapses in ethical or legalities Is so low. The premise of doing the right thing isn't in the Clinton playbook lexicon. They blatantly have a disregard for morality, they are political sociopaths, ergo Clinton consistently has poll numbers on her dishonesty.

[Fusionmunster]

Okay so I think this is bs.

Heres why:

There is no proof that the super pac "WhiteHouseWonderWoman" is connected to Hillary at all. In fact the ad clearly states its not affiliated with Hillary.

Secondly, Correct the Record is entirely online. So its not illegal for Hillarys campaign to work with them.

Im pretty sure theres nothing to this.

[Mehmentum]

The thing I don't understand is the link between 'WhiteHouseWonderwoman' and Clinton working closely with Montgomery.  I could be missing something, but the logic doesn't seem to follow.

I also don't get what exactly they're going for with the cash infusion.  Are they trying to say that Clinton is paying for the false flag operation?  I'll admit that I don't really understand the significance of a lot of what they say in the financial section.

[Ebsy]

Going to need to do better than this.

[Mehmentum]

Any more news on this?  Any media picking this up?  I did a quick google news search and found nothing on this.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

I feel that Hillary is too smart for this kind of scheme. Everything she does is calculated and this is too big of a risk. If this actually does gain traction in the media, a few lower level staff will resign, Cruz and co. will make a stink, and nothing will change.

[bagelman]

I feel that Hillary is too smart for this kind of scheme. Everything she does is calculated and this is too big of a risk. If this actually does gain traction in the media, a few lower level staff will resign, Cruz and co. will make a stink, and nothing will change.

Or maybe she just didn't factor in her minions being incompetent.

[SillyAmerican]

So the "gist", I guess, is that Hillary Clinton's campaign possibly infused a PAC that's affiliated with FCKH8 et al with $300,000 to perform a false flag operation, attacking Trump (and possibly others?) and then pinning the blame on Bernie Sanders for doing it. Of course, if this was collusion, then it violates a pretty fycking important part of FEC rules. At least, that's my main takeaway. There may be more involved here; I'm going to keep reading.

Hillary Clinton is incapable of committing election fraud; just ask her and her supporters...