A Hypothetical Election

[H. Ross Peron]

Suppose there was an election where there were two candidates of whom Candidate A believed that everything listed in the morality poll (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=213849.0) was immoral whether it be birth control or the death penalty, while Candidate B believed all of those activities were moral. In such a case who would you vote for?

FWIW, it would seem to me Candidate A would probably be a consistently conservative Catholic who additionally is bit of an animal rights activist while Candidate B would be a standard social liberal supportive of the death penalty and with rather anthropocentric views. Note that the candidates would only push for change on issues that are currently issues-for example Candidate A would not push for banning birth control.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Both are awful whackos, but candidate B would likely do less damage.

[YaBoyNY]

Candidate B, although I personally find adultery, polygamy, and animal testing to be immoral.

[SWE]

Both are awful whackos, but candidate B would likely do less damage.

[Murica!]

Both are awful whackos, but candidate B would likely do less damage.