EEOC vs Abercrombie and Fitch

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 29, 2024, 06:41:43 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Discussion

Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)

EEOC vs Abercrombie and Fitch

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Author

Topic: EEOC vs Abercrombie and Fitch (Read 828 times)

The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon

Posts: 15,974

Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread

EEOC vs Abercrombie and Fitch

« on: June 01, 2015, 12:18:58 PM »

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/01/supreme-court-abercrombie_n_7464534.html
Just when I think Thomas could not be any worse.

Logged

Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution

Posts: 58,323

Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

Re: EEOC vs Abercrombie and Fitch

« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2015, 02:18:01 PM »

Yeah, that was the correct decision.

Logged

Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God

Posts: 3,616

Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Re: EEOC vs Abercrombie and Fitch

« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2015, 10:54:35 AM »

As someone with many friends who are hijabis, I am baffled that Abercrombie thinks hijabs contradict the "preppy" look. Have you seen what some of these girls can do???

Logged

True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend

Posts: 42,144

Re: EEOC vs Abercrombie and Fitch

« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2015, 12:11:15 PM »

Thomas sometimes strains gnats to come up with a reasoning to support his views. While ideally, it would be nice to think that a neutrally worded policy would never have disparate impact, the whole history of civil rights law is liberally strewn with neutrally worded policies adopted for the specific purpose of having disparate impact and then being struck down.

Logged