1912 election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 11:59:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1912 election
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Who do you vote for?
#1
Woodrow Wilson (Democrat)
 
#2
William Howard Taft (Republican)
 
#3
Theodore Roosevelt (Bull Moose)
 
#4
Eugene Debs (Socialist)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: 1912 election  (Read 990 times)
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2015, 06:38:18 PM »

@Rocky: Taft's the conservative tool, Wilson's the revisionist.

And neither said much about environmental protection or Universal Healthcare, or not to the same extent.

Taft the trustbuster brought up 90 suits under the Sherman Antitrust Act in just four years while T. Roosevelt brought up only 44 in 8 years. Taft broke up John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil.

One of Taft's actions that angered TR enough to turn against Taft and ultimately run against him in 1912 was that Taft had brought a suit against U.S. Steel, which held 90% of the market share for steel in the United States. TR supported U.S. Steel as a "good monopoly".

Roosevelt as "progressive" hero is mythology. Taft over Roosevelt any day.
Logged
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,401
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: January 03, 2015, 07:27:32 PM »

@Rocky: Taft's the conservative tool, Wilson's the revisionist.

And neither said much about environmental protection or Universal Healthcare, or not to the same extent.

Taft the trustbuster brought up 90 suits under the Sherman Antitrust Act in just four years while T. Roosevelt brought up only 44 in 8 years. Taft broke up John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil.

One of Taft's actions that angered TR enough to turn against Taft and ultimately run against him in 1912 was that Taft had brought a suit against U.S. Steel, which held 90% of the market share for steel in the United States. TR supported U.S. Steel as a "good monopoly".

Roosevelt as "progressive" hero is mythology. Taft over Roosevelt any day.

And TR was right on that issue-there is nothing inherently wrong with "trusts" if (as TR supported) they are properly regulated especially since they can often be more economically efficient. Additionally, TR was obviously more progressive than Taft by 1912 on such issues on social welfare legislation and increasing democratic accountability through the recall, initiative, referendum etc and Taft openly running as the candidate of the conservatives in that election.
Logged
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,616
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: January 03, 2015, 11:12:30 PM »

Both TR and Taft are acceptable to me. I think if I were alive then and didn't know of the future, I'd have voted TR.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.214 seconds with 14 queries.