Should Hillary nationalize the press after she wins?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 08:15:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Should Hillary nationalize the press after she wins?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should she?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 46

Author Topic: Should Hillary nationalize the press after she wins?  (Read 1200 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 31, 2015, 01:38:35 AM »
Yes (sane). It's the only way to ensure they cover her presidency in a fair and unbiased matter.
Logged
BaconBacon96
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,678
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2015, 01:39:48 AM »
Quote from: IceSpear on May 31, 2015, 01:38:35 AM
Yes (sane). It's the only way to ensure they cover her presidency in a fair and unbiased matter.

Obviously.
Logged
Abraham Reagan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 2.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2015, 01:41:24 AM »
Everyone knows that nationalized press is the most honest, and truly journalistic form of press. Kim Jong Un told me so.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,027


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2015, 01:57:40 AM »
the clintons know how to play the game, I'm sure they'll properly punish those who stood against them once the election has been won.
Logged
Türkisblau
H_Wallace
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,401
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2015, 02:04:38 AM »
« Edited: May 31, 2015, 10:28:49 PM by Pacific Speaker Türkisblau »
Quote from: Lief 🐋 on May 31, 2015, 01:57:40 AM
the clintons know how to play the game, I'm sure they'll properly punish those who stood against them once the election has been won.

They'll finally get to send the poor Bill Richardson to the fire pits.
Logged
retromike22
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2015, 03:24:36 AM »
Quote from: Pacific Speaker Türkisblau on May 31, 2015, 02:04:38 AM
Quote from: Lief 🐋 on May 31, 2015, 01:57:40 AM
the clintons know how to play the game, I'm sure they'll properly punish those who stood against them once the election has been won.

They'll finally get send the poor Bill Richardson to the fire pits.

He can be the Ambassador to North Korea.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2015, 04:34:44 AM »
No, that's too extreme.  However, if she wins, I do think she should issue an executive order forcing Dave Leip to name IceSpear as the moderator of the US General Discussion board.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2015, 05:26:42 AM »

yeah. she should only nationalize 55% of all media outlets.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,092
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2015, 05:31:00 AM »
Just Fox News (Moderate Hero).
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2015, 09:56:07 AM »
Well she's not winning
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2015, 02:58:02 PM »
Quote from: brussels sprouts on May 31, 2015, 05:26:42 AM

yeah. she should only nationalize 55% of all media outlets.

As long as the NYT and FOX is included in the 55% I'm okay with this fair, sensible, and moderate solution.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2015, 03:20:09 PM »
What is different from the is the sheer number of Clinton friendly media outlets that protected them in the past have turned on them. NYT, WaPo, Salon, Slate etc.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,359
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 31, 2015, 03:36:20 PM »
Yes, and Obama's failure to do thus is his most significant legislative failure as POTUS.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2015, 06:30:03 PM »
Quote from: Polls_PuffPass on May 31, 2015, 04:01:36 PM
Quote from: CrabCake on May 31, 2015, 03:36:20 PM
Yes, and Obama's failure to do thus is his most significant legislative failure as POTUS.
This, friends, is Atlas.
No it is a Euro-Socialist.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2015, 07:11:18 PM »
Quote from: BaconBacon96 on May 31, 2015, 01:39:48 AM
Quote from: IceSpear on May 31, 2015, 01:38:35 AM
Yes (sane). It's the only way to ensure they cover her presidency in a fair and unbiased matter.

Obviously.
Logged
BigVic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,498
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2015, 07:32:18 PM »
No. Not a good idea
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.234 seconds with 15 queries.