CO-Keating Research (D): Obama+3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 08:48:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CO-Keating Research (D): Obama+3
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CO-Keating Research (D): Obama+3  (Read 1128 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,199
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 26, 2012, 12:33:24 AM »

Gov. Hickenlooper's accurate pollster from 2010 is back with a new poll:

48-45-2 Obama/Romney/Johnson

This poll data is based on 502 live telephone interviews with voters statewide in Colorado who are likely to vote in the November, 2012 election. Keating Research, Inc. conducted these telephone interviews from October 23-24, 2012. The worst case margin of error at the 95% level for a sample of 502 is plus or minus 4.4%.

For Umengus:

Party Registration

Republican .................................................................................. 36%
Democrat .................................................................................... 33%
Unaffiliated ................................................................................. 30%
Other........................................................................................... 1%

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/KeatingCO10231024.pdf
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,671
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2012, 12:35:30 AM »

Cool.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2012, 12:39:48 AM »

I trust this lot for CO, D-affiliated or not, they know CO.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,023


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2012, 12:43:54 AM »

Excellent!
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,131
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2012, 12:46:03 AM »

Has anyone noticed that Democratic polling firms are actually much more accurate and respectable than their Republican counterparts?
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,504
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2012, 12:50:55 AM »

Has anyone noticed that Democratic polling firms are actually much more accurate and respectable than their Republican counterparts?

lol no
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,504
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2012, 12:53:05 AM »

Gov. Hickenlooper's accurate pollster from 2010 is back with a new poll:

48-45-2 Obama/Romney/Johnson

This poll data is based on 502 live telephone interviews with voters statewide in Colorado who are likely to vote in the November, 2012 election. Keating Research, Inc. conducted these telephone interviews from October 23-24, 2012. The worst case margin of error at the 95% level for a sample of 502 is plus or minus 4.4%.

For Umengus:

Party Registration

Republican .................................................................................. 36%
Democrat .................................................................................... 33%
Unaffiliated ................................................................................. 30%
Other........................................................................................... 1%

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/KeatingCO10231024.pdf

thanks tender but I prefer D22:

I 39
R 30
D 30

Like in 2008... and I disagree
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,131
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2012, 12:58:38 AM »

Has anyone noticed that Democratic polling firms are actually much more accurate and respectable than their Republican counterparts?

lol no

Oh yeah, those Mellman guys looked really stupid in 2010 when they said that Harry Reid was winning.
And don't even start with the hacks at PPP.
Logged
Ty440
GoldenBoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2012, 01:13:24 AM »

Awesome news, CO has been a real weak spot for Obama this year.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2012, 11:46:19 AM »

Has anyone noticed that Democratic polling firms are actually much more accurate and respectable than their Republican counterparts?

That probably has something to do with the fact that fudging polling a point or two D is actually beneficial to accuracy - due to the inevitable underpolling of minorities, youths, people with only mobile phones, etc.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 26, 2012, 11:56:16 AM »

I still think Obama's NV+WI+CO+IA+NH is a viable and plausible outlook, assuming that CO Latinos come out in big numbers. I'm not convinced its all about OH (it is just mostly about OH)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.235 seconds with 14 queries.