Why is neither Party willing to discuss the problem of regulatory capture?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 10:47:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why is neither Party willing to discuss the problem of regulatory capture?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is neither Party willing to discuss the problem of regulatory capture?  (Read 315 times)
Stardust
Rookie
**
Posts: 205
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 25, 2011, 05:03:35 AM »

'Regulatory capture', in its essence, is nothing more than the phenomenon of a government regulatory body which is explicitly created to check the excesses of corporate authority turning its own authority over to the corporations it oversees.

If I were to list off every example of this, I would run out of room a hundred times over. Instead I'll simply cite a seemingly innocuous example of this, coming from the Environmental Protection Agency:

http://www.grist.org/article/food-2010-12-10-leaked-documents-show-epa-allowed-bee-toxic-pesticide-

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I rather suspect I already know the answer to this: it hits both Parties where it hurts, because it implicates both the State power structure and corporate economic system in ing over the public. Neither Party could effectively respond to it, wedded as they are to outlooks which are basically incapable of dealing with the problem. But then, I suppose, this thread is superfluous.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.221 seconds with 11 queries.