MA-01: Olver Retires
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 08:22:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MA-01: Olver Retires
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA-01: Olver Retires  (Read 2002 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 26, 2011, 03:15:49 PM »

http://www.iberkshires.com/new/story.php?story_id=39726

U.S. Rep. John W. Olver announced on Wednesday his retirement after finishing out this term.



D-1. Redistricting solved.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2011, 03:24:23 PM »

Except that Western Mass will throw a fit if a Western Mass district is eliminated.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,522


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2011, 05:20:03 PM »

I saw we eliminate Lynch and let Western Mass keep 2 seats so another Liberal Dem can take office.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,853
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2011, 05:22:44 PM »

Western Mass happens to be the obvious part of the state to lose a district and Olver is an old man. So, you know. There's a certain logic here.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,443
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2011, 08:53:23 PM »

I saw we eliminate Lynch and let Western Mass keep 2 seats so another Liberal Dem can take office.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,032


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2011, 01:03:53 AM »

Western mass can throw a fit if it wants, but slow growth and the loss of two seats in eastern Mass in past rounds means they can have two districts like Baltimore can have two districts. You can try, but you have to stretch them way far afield. It is hard to exclude Worcester without crazy tendrils.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2011, 01:48:00 PM »

Western mass can throw a fit if it wants, but slow growth and the loss of two seats in eastern Mass in past rounds means they can have two districts like Baltimore can have two districts. You can try, but you have to stretch them way far afield. It is hard to exclude Worcester without crazy tendrils.

Assuming you are correct, because of geography, most of MA-01 will likely stay intact.  Old MA-02 will likely look east instead of west to pick up residents.  And old MA-03 will take on the Worcester County parts of old MA-02 as well as some territory in Hampden, Hampshire or Franklin Counties.  It's probably better to give MA-02 all of Franklin so that the Springfield suburbs don't need to be carved into two districts.
Logged
Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas
Ray Goldfield
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,991


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2011, 05:18:23 PM »

Demographics aside, it's always easier to jettison an empty seat than displace an incumbent. I don't think Massachusetts will make waves here.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,500


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2011, 08:54:03 PM »

Western mass can throw a fit if it wants, but slow growth and the loss of two seats in eastern Mass in past rounds means they can have two districts like Baltimore can have two districts. You can try, but you have to stretch them way far afield. It is hard to exclude Worcester without crazy tendrils.

Assuming you are correct, because of geography, most of MA-01 will likely stay intact.  Old MA-02 will likely look east instead of west to pick up residents.  And old MA-03 will take on the Worcester County parts of old MA-02 as well as some territory in Hampden, Hampshire or Franklin Counties.  It's probably better to give MA-02 all of Franklin so that the Springfield suburbs don't need to be carved into two districts.

It's only better if you prioritize Springfield itself for whatever reason; Franklin and Hampshire form a community of interest, much more so than Hampshire and Hampden.
Logged
lowtech redneck
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 273
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2011, 06:33:40 PM »

Except that Western Mass will throw a fit if a Western Mass district is eliminated.

What are they going to do, vote Republican?
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2011, 10:14:13 AM »

Except that Western Mass will throw a fit if a Western Mass district is eliminated.

What are they going to do, vote Republican?

Quite possibly.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,853
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2011, 10:19:10 AM »

Except that Western Mass will throw a fit if a Western Mass district is eliminated.

What are they going to do, vote Republican?

Quite possibly.

Trolling, bist?
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2011, 10:47:14 AM »


Nope, merely having an understanding of Massachusetts politics.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,853
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2011, 10:50:31 AM »


Nope, merely having an understanding of Massachusetts politics.

Silvio O. Conte going to rise from the grave then? Would he even be a Republican now?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2011, 10:57:31 AM »


Nope, merely having an understanding of Massachusetts politics.

Silvio O. Conte going to rise from the grave then? Would he even be a Republican now?

Quite possibly.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 01, 2011, 11:09:59 AM »

This is the 1998 Massachusetts gubernatorial election.



This is the 1996 Massachusetts senate election.



The difference?  Paul Cellucci's running mate was Jane Swift, a State Senator from Western Mass.  Western Mass is extremely provincial in its voting patterns.  The reason why it switched from Republican to Democratic was not because of any switch in ideology, but simply because the collapse of the MA Republican Party meant that the Western Mass political machine had more to gain by voting Democratic than by being the base region of the Massachusetts Republicans.  Call back when you have a clue regarding what you're talking about.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,853
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 01, 2011, 11:19:34 AM »

That was thirteen years ago; an eternity in American politics. Not only that, it was for a state election. Regardless, it occurs to me that there probably aren't many popular local Republican politicians from that part of the world these days.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 01, 2011, 11:31:38 AM »

And Western Massachusetts still voted to the state's left in that election...
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,500


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2011, 12:18:20 PM »

That was thirteen years ago; an eternity in American politics. Not only that, it was for a state election. Regardless, it occurs to me that there probably aren't many popular local Republican politicians from that part of the world these days.

Right. Actually, I'd go further than that: There are no Republican politicians from western Massachusetts these days, popular or otherwise, outside the western suburbs of Springfield, which aren't exactly a great springboard for higher office.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 01, 2011, 03:19:47 PM »

The Berkshires experienced the same political shift that Vermont did -- from moderate Republicanism to ultra-liberal Democrats. There is zero chance a Republican could get elected from there today. Zero.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,814


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2011, 10:43:38 PM »

Western mass can throw a fit if it wants, but slow growth and the loss of two seats in eastern Mass in past rounds means they can have two districts like Baltimore can have two districts. You can try, but you have to stretch them way far afield. It is hard to exclude Worcester without crazy tendrils.

Assuming you are correct, because of geography, most of MA-01 will likely stay intact.  Old MA-02 will likely look east instead of west to pick up residents.  And old MA-03 will take on the Worcester County parts of old MA-02 as well as some territory in Hampden, Hampshire or Franklin Counties.  It's probably better to give MA-02 all of Franklin so that the Springfield suburbs don't need to be carved into two districts.

It's only better if you prioritize Springfield itself for whatever reason; Franklin and Hampshire form a community of interest, much more so than Hampshire and Hampden.

That may be true on the ground, but I still expect that politics will win out. I expect that Olver's district will be split now to keep the incumbents intact. MA-10 will be renumbered MA-1, and Hampden and Hampshire will be the core of MA-2.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.236 seconds with 12 queries.