Would you vote for ....

[Wakie]

Would you vote for a candidate if a picture surfaced of him clearly with an erection when surrounded by several children?

[Beet]

No.

[Akno21]

Depends what his policy was and who his opponent was

[Hitchabrut]

NO

[JohnFKennedy]

Would you vote for a candidate if a picture surfaced of him clearly with an erection when surrounded by several children?

Is the children's teacher there and is she a hot girl?

[qwerty]

I'd give him the benefit of the doubt, perhaps the erection was from something else, or for no reason at all (it is a sidefect of many medications).

[Engineer]

Of course Wakie is trying to insinuate that the picture of Dick Cheney when surrounded by children shows just that.  The photo shows only that his pants are not skin tight, so he assumes a flap of material is automatically an erection.  Therefore the premise of his post is bogus.

[opebo]

Of course I would, why not? 

As for Dick Cheney, does anyone believe he can still get erections?  Or, even if he does, that they're spontaneous and unplanned affairs (viagra)?

[Wakie]

Of course Wakie is trying to insinuate that the picture of Dick Cheney when surrounded by children shows just that.  The photo shows only that his pants are not skin tight, so he assumes a flap of material is automatically an erection.  Therefore the premise of his post is bogus.

You know the sad thing is that if the photo were Barney Frank, not Dick Cheney, you'd want to burn him at the stake.

[Engineer]

That just shows how ignorant you are.  You think, just because you're bigotted against people of other political bend, that all people are like that.  That is the sad state that the democratic party is in today, they can't see how anybody can have a different opinion.(unless they are dumb, redneck, homophobes etc.)

[Wakie]

That just shows how ignorant you are.  You think, just because you're bigotted against people of other political bend, that all people are like that.  That is the sad state that the democratic party is in today, they can't see how anybody can have a different opinion.(unless they are dumb, redneck, homophobes etc.)

Umm ... no, not really.  I'm basing this statement on other things I've read on these msg boards.  I like though how you jumped to the conclusions about my initial post.

[Engineer]

It was no jump, it was simple logical deduction.

[Democratic Hawk]

No chance. I'm a pretty moral person (though far from being one of the 'holier than thou' fraternity) with a soild understanding of what is right and wrong

Dave

[Lunar]

Probably not.

Mostly because the label of a pedophile would prevent that candidate from accomplishing anything foreign or domestically in the oval office.  Hell, it might give fundamentalist terrorists a new battle cry.

[Filuwaúrdjan]

No chance. I'm a pretty moral person (though far from being one of the 'holier than thou' fraternity) with a soild understanding of what is right and wrong

Dave

Mind if I steal you're answer? :-)