Before the Tea Party, what was the last big populist movement?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 08:36:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Before the Tea Party, what was the last big populist movement?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Before the Tea Party, what was the last big populist movement?  (Read 588 times)
LBJ Revivalist
ModerateDemocrat1990
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 799


Political Matrix
E: -5.87, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 05, 2010, 06:41:07 AM »

Before the advent of the Tea Party, what was the last big, loud populist movement which made it's presence known in our political stream, or in our culture?
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2010, 08:50:46 AM »

Depends how you define "Tea Party." The right has been continually rebranding itself (in ever more absurd manifestations) from Reagan to Gingrich to Bush to Palin.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2010, 09:39:57 AM »

Ross Perot
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2010, 03:52:29 PM »

The Populist party from the late 1800's. They managed to get James B. Weaver plenty of votes. Eventually, they merged with the Democrats.

Also, the Teabaggers aren't populists, their libertarians.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2010, 08:31:08 PM »



Also, the Teabaggers aren't populists, their libertarians.

He isn't using populist in the way you're thinking.
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2010, 08:42:38 PM »

Also, the Teabaggers aren't populists, their libertarians.

LOL
Logged
LBJ Revivalist
ModerateDemocrat1990
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 799


Political Matrix
E: -5.87, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2010, 11:28:54 PM »

Also, the Teabaggers aren't populists, their libertarians.

They WERE libertarians when it started, with Ron Paul leading it. Now they're a populist, reactionary wing of the GOP with Palin leading them.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2010, 11:48:07 PM »

Populism is left-wing, so the Teabaggers can't be populist.
Logged
LBJ Revivalist
ModerateDemocrat1990
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 799


Political Matrix
E: -5.87, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2010, 11:51:27 PM »

Populism is left-wing, so the Teabaggers can't be populist.

Well, (laugh if you want), wikipedia defines populism as:

"Populism, defined either as an ideology,[1][2][3][4] (more rarely and uncommonly) a political philosophy,[5][6][7] or a type of discourse,[3][6] i.e., of sociopolitical thought that compares "the people" against "the elite", and urges social and political system changes.  It can also be defined as a rhetorical style employed by members of various political or social movements. It is defined by the Cambridge dictionary as "political ideas and activities that are intended to represent ordinary people's needs and wishes".[8]. It can be understood as any political discourse that appeals to the general mass of the population, to the "people" as such, regardless of class distinctions and political partisanship - "a folksy appeal to the 'average guy' or some allegedly general will"[9].This is in opposition to statism, which holds that a small group of professional politicians know better than the people and should make decisions on behalf of them."

"Against the elite"
"Rhetorically for 'ordinary people'
'A folksy appeal to the average guy''

Sounds like the stuff Palin and the rest of the Tea Party folks have been peddling, albeit theirs comes with a more angry and reactionary twist, "We want our country back!"
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2010, 11:51:41 PM »


Not really, that wasn't a genuine 'movement' it was about one person and really evaporated when he did.  
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2010, 06:57:50 AM »

Ugh, this thread turned to crap pretty fast.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 12 queries.