1980: Reagan vs. Carter, No Anderson
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:07:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1980: Reagan vs. Carter, No Anderson
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1980: Reagan vs. Carter, No Anderson  (Read 6537 times)
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 22, 2010, 10:45:22 AM »

How does the 1980 map look without Anderson in the race? I find it hard to believe that all of Anderson's voters would've flocked to only Carter, or only to Reagan, but here are some maps for reference.

All Anderson voters go to Carter:


All Anderson voters go to Reagan:


So what do you think the map would've looked like?
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2010, 11:14:50 AM »
« Edited: February 09, 2011, 11:41:17 AM by Pacific Councilor Mr. Fuzzleton »



I read somewhere that Anderson hurt Carter much more than Reagan in some Northeastern states like New York and Massachusetts (New York is understandable, for Anderson was endorsed by the New York Liberal Party, which usually supports the Democrats)


So this is my map.


Reagan:  434 E.V.'s

Carter:  104 E.V.'s
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2010, 12:48:07 PM »

I also think a decent portion of the Anderson vote would've simply stayed home. This would affect the race by making Reagan's votes worth more in terms of exact percentages (for example, his share of 50.8% might all of a sudden turn into 52.8% if a large portion of voters are staying home). So I wonder how Anderson voters just not showing up to the polls would've factored into the electoral map?
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2010, 01:48:25 PM »



427-111
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2010, 10:34:29 AM »



Reagan/ Bush- 426

Carter/Mondale-112
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2010, 10:48:56 AM »



Anderson I read somewhere that Anderson hurt Carter much more than Reagan in some Northeastern states like New York and Massachusetts (New York is understandable, for Anderson was endorsed by the New York Liberal Party, which usually supports the Democrats)


So this is my map.


Reagan:  434 E.V.'s

Carter:  104 E.V.'s
This
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2010, 02:02:30 PM »



Anderson I read somewhere that Anderson hurt Carter much more than Reagan in some Northeastern states like New York and Massachusetts (New York is understandable, for Anderson was endorsed by the New York Liberal Party, which usually supports the Democrats)


So this is my map.


Reagan:  434 E.V.'s

Carter:  104 E.V.'s
This

This map seems about right. I could see a large amount of Anderson voters either holding their noses and voting for Reagan or just staying at home, thus failing to impact the results that much.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 11 queries.