Of course it's questionable how good a guide to the government's agenda this will actually be; the main thrust will be on cuts and much of this is obvious window dressing.
However... I do find the stuff wrt local government interesting. What they give with one hand, they take with the other. On the one hand, less regulation over certain policy areas, more powers over a couple of things and less government inspection. On the other, a centrally imposed freeze on council tax (during a time of deep cuts to local government budgets at that) and preventing Ipswich, Norfolk and Exeter from going it alone (which is more significant than it sounds at first). There's also the question of directly elected Mayors; now, will there be referendums on this (as was the policy of the last government) or will they be imposed? There's also another problem there; directly-elected Mayors haven't exactly been a great success in most places where they've been tried. The experiments in Doncaster and Stoke have been nothing short of disasterous, though for different reasons. The main point is that the position of local government won't really change, and my concern is that all governments become more keen on centralisation as time goes by and local election defeats pile up. If the stuff that would increase the powers of local authorities isn't introduced quickly, it might not go through at all.
Btw, the BBC also notes this:
Does that mean give local authorities more powers, or does it mean undercutting the role of local authorities in the planning process, to the benefit of local busybodies?
---
And on a totally self-interested note, proposed education policy is dreadful and lack of detail wrt higher education disturbing (and the few hints... worse). Not that I'd expected anything else.
