Shooting at the Pentagon

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

So, can I get a response from our resident expert in uses of logical fallacies?

[dead0man]

Aren't you dizzy yet Inks?

[MK]

A Black man in the white house is driving them nuts.

[paul718]

I've read through the thread twice and I cannot figure out what this incident has to do with "Right-Wing Terrorism". 

I'm so confused.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

I've read through the thread twice and I cannot figure out what this incident has to do with "Right-Wing Terrorism". 

I'm so confused.

I can't see what it has to do with terrorism at all.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

I've read through the thread twice and I cannot figure out what this incident has to do with "Right-Wing Terrorism". 

I'm so confused.

It doesn't.  Which is why Einzige stopped responding to my posts - I proved him wrong, so he's moved on to another thread.

[Scam of God]

I've read through the thread twice and I cannot figure out what this incident has to do with "Right-Wing Terrorism". 

I'm so confused.

It doesn't.  Which is why Einzige stopped responding to my posts - I proved him wrong, so he's moved on to another thread.

Hahahaha. That ego of yours isn't very Christ-like.

You didn't "prove me wrong". You attempted a lame fallacy of equivocation - "HURF DURF, THE LEFT HAS NUTS TOO!"

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

[Scam of God]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

So Paulites are right wing?

[Scam of God]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

So Paulites are right wing?

They absolutely are. Which is one of the main tenets of my entire argument here - Paulites aren't libertarians, but they're what the right-wing wants to believe libertarians are like.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

So Paulites are right wing?

They absolutely are. Which is one of the main tenets of my entire argument here - Paulites aren't libertarians, but they're what the right-wing wants to believe libertarians are like.

There's a wide range of Paulites.  I hardly think you can classify all Paulites as right-wing.

[Scam of God]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

So Paulites are right wing?

They absolutely are. Which is one of the main tenets of my entire argument here - Paulites aren't libertarians, but they're what the right-wing wants to believe libertarians are like.

There's a wide range of Paulites.  I hardly think you can classify all Paulites as right-wing.

Ah, so Ron Paul is really a Trojan horse and advocates for voluntary communalization. Gotchya.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

So Paulites are right wing?

They absolutely are. Which is one of the main tenets of my entire argument here - Paulites aren't libertarians, but they're what the right-wing wants to believe libertarians are like.

There's a wide range of Paulites.  I hardly think you can classify all Paulites as right-wing.

Ah, so Ron Paul is really a Trojan horse and advocates for voluntary communalization. Gotchya.

Ron Paul didn't exactly go out and pick who his supporters would be - and this has nothing to do with communalization.

[Scam of God]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

So Paulites are right wing?

They absolutely are. Which is one of the main tenets of my entire argument here - Paulites aren't libertarians, but they're what the right-wing wants to believe libertarians are like.

There's a wide range of Paulites.  I hardly think you can classify all Paulites as right-wing.

Ah, so Ron Paul is really a Trojan horse and advocates for voluntary communalization. Gotchya.

Ron Paul didn't exactly go out and pick who his supporters would be - and this has nothing to do with communalization.

But it has everything to do with the fact that Paul is a right-winger and that his sympathizers are therefore de facto right-wingers, including this fellow.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

So Paulites are right wing?

They absolutely are. Which is one of the main tenets of my entire argument here - Paulites aren't libertarians, but they're what the right-wing wants to believe libertarians are like.

There's a wide range of Paulites.  I hardly think you can classify all Paulites as right-wing.

Ah, so Ron Paul is really a Trojan horse and advocates for voluntary communalization. Gotchya.

Ron Paul didn't exactly go out and pick who his supporters would be - and this has nothing to do with communalization.

But it has everything to do with the fact that Paul is a right-winger and that his sympathizers are therefore de facto right-wingers, including this fellow.

No he's not. Ron Paul is a libertarian.

[Scam of God]

No.  I asked you to define "right wing" and tell me how it relates to this guy - something that you have so far failed to do.

And I have already defined it for you: the man was a Paulite.

So Paulites are right wing?

They absolutely are. Which is one of the main tenets of my entire argument here - Paulites aren't libertarians, but they're what the right-wing wants to believe libertarians are like.

There's a wide range of Paulites.  I hardly think you can classify all Paulites as right-wing.

Ah, so Ron Paul is really a Trojan horse and advocates for voluntary communalization. Gotchya.

Ron Paul didn't exactly go out and pick who his supporters would be - and this has nothing to do with communalization.

But it has everything to do with the fact that Paul is a right-winger and that his sympathizers are therefore de facto right-wingers, including this fellow.

No he's not. Ron Paul is a libertarian.

I'll believe it when I see it.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

1. Ron Paul is not a right winger.
2. That's a logical fallacy.  Not everybody who supports Ron Paul supports all of his policies (even IF he were a right winger), otherwise, everybody who votes for a Republican would be a Republican, or everybody who votes for a Democrat would be a Democrat, and we would have only a small percentage of Independents who vote for other candidates.

EDIT: I'm off to eat a bag of popcorn - I'll be back in a bit.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

What does Ron Paul have to do with this thread topic anyway?

[Scam of God]

1. Ron Paul is not a right winger.

So are the Tea Parties right-winged? Or are both right-winged only when it's convenient for you?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But it's quite clear we're dealing with an obvious, ardent, right-winged Paulite, given that he acted out on a typically Paulite fantasy. Not ever Paul supporter is a Paulite, but most Paulites are Paul supporters, one might say.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

1. Some Tea Partiers are right-winged.  Some aren't.  The whole Tea Party movement doesn't fit into a classification like this.

2. There's no proof that this guy is necessarily a Paulite, just that he's probably a crazy conspiracy theorist.

3. You still haven't shown how this guy lines up with the beliefs of right wingers.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

E has such tunnel vision that there is only one view to every situation - his.

[Sbane]

Not sure if the guy was a right winger, left winger, libertarian etc., but if he was a brown I bet some distinguished news channels, like Fox, would be calling him a terrorist.