Libertarians Unite!
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 05:28:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Libertarians Unite!
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Libertarians Unite!  (Read 1166 times)
Historia Crux
Andy Jackson
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,148
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 02, 2008, 11:10:17 PM »

How could a Libertarian surge work? How could third parties become more active in major national politics?
Logged
Albus Dumbledore
Havelock Vetinari
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,917
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the


Political Matrix
E: -0.71, S: -2.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2008, 08:58:20 AM »

Have Baker V. Carr(70s supreme court case) mandate proportional representation instead of allowing gerrymandering to continue.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2008, 09:47:52 AM »

Have Baker V. Carr(70s supreme court case) mandate proportional representation instead of allowing gerrymandering to continue.

Gerrymandering does not affect the results of third parties, at least not in the same way as it does for the major parties.
Logged
Albus Dumbledore
Havelock Vetinari
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,917
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the


Political Matrix
E: -0.71, S: -2.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2008, 11:17:24 AM »

Have Baker V. Carr(70s supreme court case) mandate proportional representation instead of allowing gerrymandering to continue.

Gerrymandering does not affect the results of third parties, at least not in the same way as it does for the major parties.

First-past the post means third parties aren't able to be effectual even without gerrymandering. You need proportional representation to get strong third parties in US politics.
Logged
Bluegrass Cruiser 420
Rookie
**
Posts: 104
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2008, 02:04:12 PM »

Well we could be like Canada and have 4 to 5 parties most with only regional support. One being the Quebec Secession party.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,411
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2008, 04:15:37 PM »

Well we could be like Canada and have 4 to 5 parties most with only regional support. One being the Quebec Secession party.

lol
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2008, 01:16:12 AM »

All 300,000 members of the Libertarian Party nationwide should move to a small state like Wyoming and start a city called "Freedom City" or something.  By the time redistricting rolls around, all the State House and Senate districts will be in Freedom City and all be Libertarians; the Census will provide a House district to give Wyoming 4 EVs (one Libertarian House member) and then both Senators, the Governor, and all other statewide elected offices will be held by Libertarians in a 60% mandate caused by the 100% turnout of the 300k voters in the city.

The Libertarian Party nominee will also get 4 EVs guaranteed every Presidential election. That kind of publicity and power will lead to the Libertarians gaining huge national momentum as more people become aware of the movement and start strong Libertarian Parties in other states.

Basically, it's the Bloc Quebecois method of creating a nationally recognized political party.
Logged
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2008, 02:01:07 AM »

All 300,000 members of the Libertarian Party nationwide should move to a small state like Wyoming and start a city called "Freedom City" or something.  By the time redistricting rolls around, all the State House and Senate districts will be in Freedom City and all be Libertarians; the Census will provide a House district to give Wyoming 4 EVs (one Libertarian House member) and then both Senators, the Governor, and all other statewide elected offices will be held by Libertarians in a 60% mandate caused by the 100% turnout of the 300k voters in the city.

The Libertarian Party nominee will also get 4 EVs guaranteed every Presidential election. That kind of publicity and power will lead to the Libertarians gaining huge national momentum as more people become aware of the movement and start strong Libertarian Parties in other states.

Basically, it's the Bloc Quebecois method of creating a nationally recognized political party.

I think it would be very effective if the Libertarians focus on the small states and put most of their resources there. It's cheap to advertise in these states and there's a close link. I say have a state with 3 EV focus on running the Presidential, U.S. House and U.S. Senate races together.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2008, 03:13:35 PM »

I good idea would be to concentrate on winning local races and not run anything on a federal level.  The process may take a long time, but it is certainly more effective than what is going on now
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 12 queries.