Amendment to Official Senate Rules and Procedures (Debating)

[windjammer]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well,
This is an obligation for the Senate to elect a PPT.

You have indeed the right to elect a Speaker or whatever, but the election of a PPT must figure in the senate rules too.

[windjammer]

We can just vote on a PPT when we elect a Speaker. It's already in the Constitution, so I don't think it's a big deal.

Anyway, I think enough time expired after TNF and I called for a final vote that we need to have one.

But that won't be a little strange to vote for both a speaker and a PPT???

[windjammer]

Nay
I respect Averroes Nix's job and I thank him for having improved the rules.
But, I simply disagree with the new VP roles. I believe the VP should have a role in the senate and these senate rules just strip him all of his duties.
I believe we risk to have an another concern in the next month: the VP's role. If an office has no function, this office risks to die.

[windjammer]

I knew we had neglected something.


Windjammer, would you be interested in working with me on an amendment to reinsert VP responsbilities so as to avoid your likely correct prediction of its eventual demise otherwise?

Of course, I'm really busy today and tomorrow, but Thursday I'm free.
I have some ideas, I will PMm you about that soon!