Local Office of IDS Emperor Scott - Salisbury, NC (Back in Business)

[windjammer]

As you know, we disagree on some important issues and we would probably huge enemies in the democratic primaries.
But, considering that the IDS is the most conservative region of Atlasia, you're definitely the best choice here. Some of your bills have been fairly good, like your fight against homeless,... You seem to be an active legislator.
That's why I endorse your candidacy!

[windjammer]

considering that the IDS is the most conservative region of Atlasia

Did the Mideast stop existing?

I mean, the IDS is historically a conservative region. Whereas the Mideast was relative competitive before!

[windjammer]

Thank you again

[windjammer]

Dude...I hate to restart this argument but you realize your education law outlawed private education, right?

It did. Which is why I signed it. Deus was even kind enough to accept some of my edits. The same thing with the bilingual education act, I voted against it for fiscal concerns and because it wasn't a good bill. The intention was good, but the bill wasn't. I will admit I was more of a stickler when you were Gov, Scott.

Maybe Scott's reforms needed to be improved a bit,
But there is a difference between reforming in the good way, and simply destroying the system.

And that's why you have done by totally cutting the Northeast Budget in education.

If some things could be improved, fine, that's great. But the reforms that Dallasfan and Sirnick have signed are really terrible.

[windjammer]

Dude...I hate to restart this argument but you realize your education law outlawed private education, right?

It did. Which is why I signed it. Deus was even kind enough to accept some of my edits. The same thing with the bilingual education act, I voted against it for fiscal concerns and because it wasn't a good bill. The intention was good, but the bill wasn't. I will admit I was more of a stickler when you were Gov, Scott.

Maybe Scott's reforms needed to be improved a bit,
But there is a difference between reforming in the good way, and simply destroying the system.

And that's why you have done by totally cutting the Northeast Budget in education.

If some things could be improved, fine, that's great. But the reforms that Dallasfan and Sirnick have signed are really terrible.

Actually, the Northeast budget for education went down because a law was repealed providing money for public university and college education --while the GM cost report for my universal public college/university bill was lower than what we were subsidizing so I repealed the law subsidizing public college/university education in lieu of universal public college/university education.

(TL;DR - It was cheaper to provide free public university/college education for everyone)

And who signed the  repeal of the law rproviding money for public univertsity and college education?

[windjammer]

Dude...I hate to restart this argument but you realize your education law outlawed private education, right?

It did. Which is why I signed it. Deus was even kind enough to accept some of my edits. The same thing with the bilingual education act, I voted against it for fiscal concerns and because it wasn't a good bill. The intention was good, but the bill wasn't. I will admit I was more of a stickler when you were Gov, Scott.

Maybe Scott's reforms needed to be improved a bit,
But there is a difference between reforming in the good way, and simply destroying the system.

And that's why you have done by totally cutting the Northeast Budget in education.

If some things could be improved, fine, that's great. But the reforms that Dallasfan and Sirnick have signed are really terrible.

Actually, the Northeast budget for education went down because a law was repealed providing money for public university and college education --while the GM cost report for my universal public college/university bill was lower than what we were subsidizing so I repealed the law subsidizing public college/university education in lieu of universal public college/university education.

(TL;DR - It was cheaper to provide free public university/college education for everyone)

And who signed the  repeal of the law rproviding money for public univertsity and college education?

...the law subsidized public university/college education...which is not needed when you are providing free public education.  It would have been fiscally irresponsible not to repeal it. Its like buying an apple for $2 at the store, and giving the cashier $10, its silly.

Also, did you check how many billions of dollars we invested in schools via the 3 stimulus packages we passed when I was Governor? Please investigate.

Woooow, so you justify the bill you signed destroying education in the Northeast, by the necessity because of a the repeal of a bill providing money for public college, a law you signed as well. Wooow, great record.

I consider the funding of education a top priority, I even think this is fiscally responsible to be sure education is funded by the Regional government, we don't seem to have the same definition of fiscal responsibility.

And please, could you send to me the laws please? I would really like to investigate as well.

[windjammer]

Thank you for the links Sirnick, I will look at this links carefully and then post my answer.

[windjammer]

Sirnick, that's not really what you're saying.

The law I'm specifically critising you, this is this law:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=186636.0
And this law passed in 2014.

You were the DemPGH's VP for the October 2013 presidential election.

(I'm writing an another answer, don't worry).

[windjammer]

Sirnick, that's not really what you're saying.

The law I'm specifically critising you, this is this law:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=186636.0
And this law passed in 2014.

You were the DemPGH's VP for the October 2013 presidential election.

(I'm writing an another answer, don't worry).

You criticized me for signing Deus' amendment to the Education Improvement Act, then you criticized me regarding education funding which has to do with the Higher Education Act, and I proved you wrong by showing you the budget and the stimulus packages. In addition to saying that the Education Improvement Act pretty much made private schools public (a needed change).

DemPGH responded talking about the Higher Education Act which passed in early October/late September along with the budget.

You also hit me for the bilingual education act, which happened prior to October 2013, and DemPGH.

Do I really need to outline your own argument Windjammer? Come on man.

Oh please, my critic was mostly because of the law you signed and that Deus sponsored. And you know that, see the DemPGH's thread. DemPGH picked you as your VP few months before...

And for the bilingual education act, I hit Dallasfan, your VP, for having repealed this law, not you, and once again you can verify. Dallasfan has never been DemPGH's VP.

Once again, you can check on the DemPGH's thread.

[windjammer]

Sirnick, if you want to support Dallasfan for the repeal of this law, fine, but you cannot say I hit you on the educational language, I didn't know you voted against it when I critized Dallasfan for that.

And for the education law I mostly critized you, it passed after the October 2013 election, after DemPGH picked you as his VP.

So your attack on DemPGH choosing you as your VP. That's not simply true.

Well, just to say again I have nothing against you Sirnick, nothing personal.

[windjammer]

Sirnick, if you want to support Dallasfan for the repeal of this law, fine, but you cannot say I hit you on the educational language, I didn't know you voted against it when I critized Dallasfan for that.

And for the education law I mostly critized you, it passed after the October 2013 election, after DemPGH picked you as his VP.

So your attack on DemPGH choosing you as your VP. That's not simply true.

Well, just to say again I have nothing against you Sirnick, nothing personal.

Oh, I appreciate DemPGH choosing me as his VP in October, I'm not attacking him for it.

And of course I support my Vice Presidential pick, who doesn't support their VP pick?

 The Higher Education Act passed before the election (October 6th it was signed. Election is like the third Friday in October or something).

But not the Deus amendment , the bill once again I mostly criticized you.