Subsidies through Healthcare.gov may be illegal. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 02:51:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Subsidies through Healthcare.gov may be illegal. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Subsidies through Healthcare.gov may be illegal.  (Read 5037 times)
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,297
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« on: July 26, 2014, 11:31:55 AM »

Well yes, there is now a circuit split but the 4th circuit one is unlikely to change position whereas there's likely to be an en banc review in the DC circuit. That, in my view, will likely lead to a reversal and no split. Stay tuned.

And this is precisely why Obama's nominees were not getting approved for the DC circuit   

And exactly why Harry Reid exercised the nuclear option. This will be one of the first major tests of the new 7-4 Democratic-appointed majority on the DC Circuit. Two of the three judges that heard this case have senior status. I don't know if they sit on the en banc panel as well, but it's basically irrelevant in this case since those two would effectively cancel each other out. If the DC Circuit does grant an en banc hearing, I bet they overturn this case. That would almost certainly delay any possible action from SCOTUS, as they generally don't take cases where there's no split among the circuit courts.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,297
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2014, 11:06:01 AM »

I didn't see this mentioned anywhere else, but that panel's ruling has been overturned, as the entire DC Circuit will hear the case:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I think the fact they vacated the 3-judge panel's ruling bodes well for a favourable ruling from the entire DC Circuit Court. If anyone doubts the significance of the nuclear option now, here you go. There's no way this would've happened without the post-nuclear option appointees. It doesn't get a lot of attention, but the judiciary has changed considerably under President Obama.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.