Has the Reformation gone too far? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 01:25:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Has the Reformation gone too far? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Has the Reformation gone too far?  (Read 2393 times)
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


« on: February 12, 2015, 06:00:28 PM »

Has the Reformation gone too far?

No. Once religion (Catholicism, the Latin Church, etc.) ceased to be an arm of the Government, and its worship ceased to be enforced, then what you see in the O.P. is perfectly expected. God always tells everyone something different, see. Wink
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2015, 01:06:04 PM »

Has the Reformation gone too far?

No. Once religion (Catholicism, the Latin Church, etc.) ceased to be an arm of the Government, and its worship ceased to be enforced, then what you see in the O.P. is perfectly expected. God always tells everyone something different, see. Wink

LOL. You are a history student, right?

Haha, was, past tense. Good days. Late Medieval, Renaissance, history of science (Margaret Cavendish was a fascinating person), Milton generally.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2015, 06:15:59 PM »
« Edited: February 15, 2015, 06:17:45 PM by DemPGH »

^Augsburg "Peace"? Oh, sure. That specific thing was more a product of central Europe, I believe, but I think the general concept was fairly commonplace (although, as with England, there were plenty of Catholic plots to affect politics, which was what Liz was so legitimately worried about). But yeah, the religious turmoil tore central Europe apart, so it was decided that princely privilege would include telling everyone how to worship for the sake of "unity." Of course that settled nothing.

In any event, the Thirty Years War kind of stemmed from that, and it interrupted the work of one of my heroes: Johan Kepler. He figured out the Laws of Planetary Motion, then Newton later discovered the math behind those laws so as to explain them in natural, scientific terms. There was nothing mystical about them at all, but being religious, Kepler of course appealed to God to explain what he could not. I guess that "god" was Newton, haha. Tongue

You know, and then Milton railed against religion and government being so intertwined and so on. I like to look at Milton as a statesman more than a literary figure. He wrote beautiful, timeless treatises on divorce, religion and state, censorship, and other matters, and of course was on the side of progress.

As to the O.P., though, I mean, sure it's all gone too far - it went too far right from the beginning, but I think it's to be expected once religion is "de-centralized." You get pious hoaxers, scammers, deluded people masquerading as prophets, and so on.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.