SCOTUS (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 09:21:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  SCOTUS (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SCOTUS  (Read 2650 times)
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


« on: June 30, 2014, 09:16:25 AM »

Probably not good.

While I don't think employers should be the ones providing healthcare, I find it very troubling that they would allow a company to opt out of a law they have already found to be Constitutional because of some religious objection. I read somewhere that it will be the first time in US History that the Court has allowed something like that, although I don't know if that is true or not. It is certainly egregious, nevertheless. 
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2014, 11:29:45 AM »

Religious exemptions for certain birth control medications should have been granted from the outset, without SCOTUS.

Disagree. I look at it through the opposite side of the prism, unsurprisingly. The employees should be protected from the religion of the guy at the top, not the guy at the top given reign to push his religious beliefs on the employees.

I'm deeply skeptical of religious exemptions as well since I think they are a cop-out. In this instance, the health department trumps the religion of some guy in Oklahoma or Kentucky somewhere who owns a business and wants to discriminate.

Well, get ready more of these, folks! And hope against hope that one of these five will resign in the foreseeable future. Heh. Won't hold my breath.

Seems like a bizarrely narrow decision given the scope of the logic that it's premised on. I mean, employers can refuse to buy contraception in the case of a religious objection, but a similar religious objection to some other medical treatment holds no water?

Smacks of Kennedy honestly. Yeah, and also one kind of business versus another kind of business; this is an instance of religious expression by a company, but that is not. This company can do it, but that company cannot.

Pbbbbbbbbt. Bizzarre-o.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.