Sorry

[DemPGH]

Well, I want to stay out of this, but on the subject of inactivity there's something that's not been said that must be. In the last At Large election Sjoyce was the odd man out - he could have helped the Senate, and his expertise in foreign policy there could been majorly helpful. But instead we got someone who was almost entirely inactive, and managed even to be snarky about it, yet gave us. . . a bit of comic sans.

[DemPGH]

'Mkay. Are we talking about a tougher activity requirement than the 19th? I'll be among the first to support it! I've been very active and I believe that activity makes the game run more smoothly and function better. I also recognize that, you know, sometimes you get to a point where you need a break, even if you've been active and productive, as some have. So, take a break. I wouldn't support an activity requirement that's too tough, though, because there is RL. Also, when I call someone out or rip on them, I'm taking into consideration what I think are their intentions as well.