Normington Petts/End Citizens United (D): Clinton +10 (2-way) Clinton +8 (4-way) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 12:32:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Normington Petts/End Citizens United (D): Clinton +10 (2-way) Clinton +8 (4-way) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Normington Petts/End Citizens United (D): Clinton +10 (2-way) Clinton +8 (4-way)  (Read 1625 times)
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« on: August 19, 2016, 08:56:27 AM »

LOLz, the best an advocacy group can do with a D+8 sample. I might as well show you the complete junk poll from "US Daily Wire" that shows Trump up 6 while I am at it.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2016, 09:38:06 AM »

Yes this poll that is in line with the polling averages is definitely comparable to the literally made-up poll that is a double-digit outlier. Your critical thinking abilities continue to impress.
This hack poll is not in line with the polling over the past two weeks.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2016, 10:52:32 AM »

Yes this poll that is in line with the polling averages is definitely comparable to the literally made-up poll that is a double-digit outlier. Your critical thinking abilities continue to impress.
This hack poll is not in line with the polling over the past two weeks.

Yes it is. Polling dictates that if this is a +6 to +8 race for Clinton, some polls will show a closer race than the average and some polls will show Clinton with a larger lead than the average. Thats why we use polling aggregates.
Except it doesn't. But you believe the narrative you want to believe and cling onto those LV polls from Early August.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2016, 11:22:44 AM »

All this BS from Seriously is gonna make him taking a big L on election night so much sweeter. Please don't leave until then.
You mean actual math and numbers = BS now...

Look. I may be a partisan when it comes to the race itself, but I'll say it until I am blue in the face. Numbers are numbers.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2016, 04:05:11 AM »

All this BS from Seriously is gonna make him taking a big L on election night so much sweeter. Please don't leave until then.
You mean actual math and numbers = BS now...

Look. I may be a partisan when it comes to the race itself, but I'll say it until I am blue in the face. Numbers are numbers.

But calling something a "hack poll" does not in and of itself constitute using "math and numbers."
It's akin to a Democrat internal for crying out loud. You wouldn't see me gleefully touting something from the NRA as gospel as to where the race is right now. This particular poll is not worth the bandwidth used for this thread.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.