Kurt Warner...wtf?

[12th Doctor]

http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/2009/01/thats-good.html

Did he say he believed Jesus and the Father were "two separate beings"?!

I have always thought the wording of the Trinity Doctrine, "three persons", was a very very poor choice of words that has confused many Christians, like Kurt Warner, and led Muslims and Jews to believe Christianity isn't monotheistic.

The simple truth of Christianity is that God manifested himself in human flesh, and the identity of that "being" inside of that flesh was the one and only Supreme Being, God.  And it is in complete agreement with the bible to claim that the being inside of the flesh we know as Jesus Christ, was none other than God the Father.

That's the evangelical theological take for you.  Because a religious concept can be confusing, it must be wrong.

This reminds me of the time someone argued to me that "transubstantiation" is a false teaching, backed up with the notion that it was hard for this person to pronounce, and therefore, made up.

[12th Doctor]

have you ever noticed that you constantly defend your doctrine more than you defend scripture?

If by my doctrine you mean my interpretation of scripture, then I don't see how I can seperate the two.

Your doctrine seems to me to be largely predicated on taking a few versus of scripture out of context, and then taking the notion of scripture itself out of context, just to make it clear to everyone that you can't be convinced by reason.