L.A. threw itself parties (and the L.A. Times produced banner headlines) when the city reached the 1-million and 1.5-million levels, in 1923 and 1940. (The 1-million mark was estimated by counting the number of, among other things, barber shops.)...................
But don't expect a lot of celebrating of the new milestone.
This is what I can't stand about demographics these days. Why aren't milestones like this something to be proud of anymore? People are such lazy anti-immigrant complainers they can't be bothered to celebrate anything other than sports victories.
An increasing population is a healthy sign, and something to be proud of. Except if its increasing too fast or its Muslims in Europe, because that is a terrible trend. Latinos want to become American, Euro-Muslims hate Europe and want to subvert it.
It's something to be proud of if you have a well planned out, well-thought out city. Clearly, you are not quiet familiar with the situation in Los Angeles. It is a city planners nightmare and the sprawl in the city has long since surpassed epic proportions.
BTW... this thought
and this thought
Clash a bit. Not to mention that your signature contains the candidate who is popular with a number of those people you are railing against.
