biblical inerrancy

[12th Doctor]

pure doctrinalism.  to me it is inimical to the quest for Christ.  the texts range from being written decades after the death of Christ through, what a few decades from 325?

a few decades from 325?   yeah, I guess that is why the books of the New Testament were being quoted from around 125 AD.

Which books, and are they still in the Bible?

IN a single letter from Pope Clement (30- 95 A.D.) he used 95 quotes from 10 of the 27 book of the New Testament.

Various Gospels
Acts
Romans
I Corinthians
Titus
Hebrews
1Peter
2Peter
James

Fixed it.

[12th Doctor]

As for the question itself...

Of course I accept that the Bible is inerrant in spirit.  I even believe that it is inerrant in specific text.  The question is, how do we interpret said text, in a contextual understanding, and how to we apply those lessons to our world.  This is where the strict, fundamentalist argument implodes.

P.S.  Well, that and the fact that they are ridiculously selective in what they chose to apply their "absolute literalism" model, to the point of absolute hypocrisy.