Rasmussen: Florida Governor Race a Tossup (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 07:57:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  Rasmussen: Florida Governor Race a Tossup (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen: Florida Governor Race a Tossup  (Read 5210 times)
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« on: January 07, 2006, 06:22:24 AM »

Certainly, grounds for optimism among Democrats. I agree with Ben that the GOP has the edge in though

In competitive races, Democrats need to select the best possible candidate

Dave
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2006, 10:25:52 AM »

In competitive races, Democrats need to select the best possible candidate

Thank you for this sage advice; here I was going to select the worst possible candidate in every race. Tongue

I'm sure you wouldn't Gabu - nor would I - but plenty of Democrats have done, do and will continue to do so. Unfortunately

Dave
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2006, 10:57:10 AM »

In competitive races, Democrats need to select the best possible candidate

Thank you for this sage advice; here I was going to select the worst possible candidate in every race. Tongue

I'm sure you wouldn't Gabu - nor would I - but plenty of Democrats have done, do and will continue to do so. Unfortunately

Dave

Well, the problem is not that people purposely support the worst candidate, but that there's a lot of debate over who the "best" candidate is.  It's not exactly a scientific thing than is very well-defined.

That it isn't but many Democrats are not immune from cutting off their noses to spite their face, which goes to someway to explaining why the party's in now in minority status and has lost 7 of the last 10 presidential elections. I'm more of a pragmatist than an ideological purist

I'd support a centrist to moderate conservative Democrat running in a GOP-held state or district if I thought they were the best chance of a pick-up. That said, I certainly wouldn't advocate selecting candidates who would "out-conservatise" the GOP candidate

The Democratic Party was at its strongest when it was a "big tent" party, but it lost much of its support in recent years for many reasons. And the party needs to win back some of that support, if it is even to hope to regain its majority status

Dave
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2006, 11:22:38 AM »

Gustav, I think you make a good point

In fact, given the diversity of the US, it's difficult for many people to understand why such a country as large and diverse as the US is, to all intents and purposes, a two-party state

Of course, electoral reform (i.e. abolishing first-past-the-post, simple majority electoral system) could see minor parties having a breakthrough. Furthermore, it's so money-orientated in America, that it doesn't really give smaller parties much of a chance

I often wonder the fact that only the Democrats or the Republicans are 'worth' voting for - I mean no disrespect to any other parties here - explains why among Western liberal democracies, the US has a comparatively lower turnout

Dave
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 15 queries.