Incumbency: Is the 'incumbency advantage' overrated? Can it be a disadvantage? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:21:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Incumbency: Is the 'incumbency advantage' overrated? Can it be a disadvantage? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Incumbency: Is the 'incumbency advantage' overrated? Can it be a disadvantage?  (Read 9546 times)
Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,985
United States


WWW
« on: September 05, 2018, 08:20:38 PM »

Incumbency is a tremendous advantage, at the Presidential level for the following reasons:

1.  Incumbents get to set the agenda, more than anyone else.  Challengers are always responding to the agenda the incumbent sets.

2.  Incumbents are presumed to have the experience to do the job; challengers have to prove themselves as a rule.

3.  The incumbent's entire party is tied to the success or failure of the incumbent, whereas a Herman Talmadge or a Ben Sasse can distance themselves from a McGovern or a Trump and get away with it.

Of course, an incumbent can be an idiot or corrupt and forfeit these advantages.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.