Trump: terror suspects shouldn't get Due Process, or medical treatment! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 02:39:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Trump: terror suspects shouldn't get Due Process, or medical treatment! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump: terror suspects shouldn't get Due Process, or medical treatment!  (Read 1525 times)
Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,986
United States


WWW
« on: September 19, 2016, 08:10:04 PM »

Trump's on a roll today... he's upset that the suspect (an American citizen) is

1. allowed to get medical treatment

2. has to have a trial through the due process of the law before he's punished


He doesn't seem to understand the point of trial... or understand that mob anger shouldn't determine the outcome of a court case... or why we have most amendments in the Bill of Rights...


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.




Trump Complains That Bombing Suspect Will Get Medical Care, Due Process (Rahami is an American citizen)

Trump is off base on due process.  I believe he knows better, but he's not the first Presidential candidate who panders to the "Silent Majority".  I remember back in the 1970s when a survey asked folks whether or not they agreed with a number of proposals that were, in fact, the Bill of Rights.  Most folks actually opposed them.  Nixon played this to the hilt.

Of course, when folks get together and express the idea that maybe it isn't a good idea to increase the number of folks emigrating to America, or deporting those who are here illegally, regardless of circumstances, folks like Hillary aren't big 1st Amendment fans, so . . .

Logged
Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,986
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2016, 04:57:45 PM »

I don't think there's been a nominee for President with more contempt for the constitution and what it means.
Yet his supporters will at least "say" they're defending the Constitution from evil anti-constitutionalist Hillary.
If you had lived through the Nixon Administration you wouldn't be saying this.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.