Bill Kristol announces someone will run 3rd party UPDATE: It's David French (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 07:27:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Bill Kristol announces someone will run 3rd party UPDATE: It's David French (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bill Kristol announces someone will run 3rd party UPDATE: It's David French  (Read 9308 times)
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,000
United States


WWW
« on: May 30, 2016, 04:39:43 PM »

^I think the long-term consequences at the presidential level would be far more disastrous for the GOP, with states like TX, MS and GA becoming battlegrounds. If the Democrats play their cards right, they'll be able to lock the GOP out of the White House for maybe another 20 years.

Nah, I doubt it.  When Trump loses, the unanimous backlash against him will be a sight to behold.  The GOP will recover quickly because their voters are idiots with short memories.  You talk about 1964; look what happened four years later.

That's not that good a comparison to make, considering there was a fairly strong third party challenge (Wallace) and Nixon won with only 42% nationally.

Wallace wasn't a third-party candidate in the truest sense of the word.  He never really left the Democratic Party, and he was the Democratic nominee for President in Alabama.  He did not field a slate of Congressional candidates, and many Democratic politicians in the South openly supported Wallace in 1968.

1968 was a year where Democratic voters in the South left the national Democratic party, but a minority of those went to the GOP, even at the Presidential level.  Indeed, the Southern Democrats were a hardy breed; it is only since 2010 that they have truly died, not to be resurrected.  They had been weakened progressively over time, but still managed to come back until 2010; now, there's no immediate pathway back for most of them.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,000
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2016, 06:21:09 AM »

David French would have a great resume for a candidate for the state legislature, and a passable resume for a candidate for Congress, but he doesn't have the credentials for major statewide office or a cabinet post, let alone for a serious presidential bid.

The national political party that will have the best credentials for their presidential and vice presidential nominees this coming November is the Libertarian Party.

(I agree with your post. But Mr. French is clearly not going to become president. His candidacy is going to an ideas-based one.)

At a certain level, people are smart enough not to vote for a guy whose ideas are closer to theirs, but who is not qualified to be President in the traditional sense and has no change of winning, when they are faced with the idea that by doing so, the candidate that will be elected will have "ideas" further away from theirs than the candidate they rejected who was closer to their "ideas".  David French?  Kristol, are you really serious?

If Kristol and the Never Trumpers were serious, they'd endorse Gary Johnson, who's significantly closer to the bulk of their issue positions.  Of course, they're not neocons, so . . .
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.