Why didn't Kucinich gain any momentum? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 02:03:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why didn't Kucinich gain any momentum? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why didn't Kucinich gain any momentum?  (Read 2181 times)
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
United States


WWW
« on: March 22, 2015, 08:05:32 PM »

Kucinich didn't get momentum because he's perceived as a loser, and this is a problem for a candidate.  If people think you're a loser before you show up for the first debate, you have probably too much of a hard row to hoe to make it.  Donors aren't going to fund a candidate they believe is sure to lose for any other reason than a siphoning operation against an enemy. 

Lots of guys have this issue.  Nixon had to overcome the "loser" image in 1968; it was an image that hung on and it kept others in the game.  It haunts Rick Perry (who's a joke) and Rick Santorum (who is more competent, but who lost big in 2006).  It cost McGovern influence in his party; he was never viewed, even to the left, in the light that Barry Goldwater was viewed by the GOP.  (Goldwater's lost was the first step toward making the GOP a victorious conservative party; McGovern's loss became an albatross around the party's neck to this day.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.