Opinion of Young Earth Creationism (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 10:52:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Opinion of Young Earth Creationism (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Pick the answer that comes closest to your view
#1
I'm a Young Earth Creationist, so obviously positive
 
#2
It has some good points, but it's probably not completely correct
 
#3
I don't go around ridiculing the viewpoint, but I'm pretty firm in my view that it is incorrect
 
#4
It is a dangerous viewpoint that we need to work to eradicate
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 76

Author Topic: Opinion of Young Earth Creationism  (Read 5368 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« on: April 26, 2017, 08:54:25 PM »

Obviously it's incorrect, but I think its poor reputation is undeserved.

The notion that YEC is harmful and ought to be eradicated is risible, particularly when one considers some of the ideas it's grouped in. Creationism is hardly as bad as racism or anti-vaccination, and several false ideas worse than it seem to get a pass.

Frankly, YEC is a sort of condensed symbol for a certain sort of low church, generally lower class Protestant. A lot of the criticism of it seems to be a pretext for chauvinism and classism against those people. And just so you don't think I'm secular-bashing, this seems to be just as much of a problem within the church as it is outside of it.

Do these people actually still exist? I've never met one in real life.

I know several, most notably my wife. Most of the ones I know keep pretty quiet about it outside of their Evangelical subculture, so it's not that surprising that you haven't met an open Young Earth Creationist, given your religion, location, education etc.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2017, 06:51:54 PM »

My main issue with Young Earth Creationism is this: (1) people who believe in it (without a single exception I know of) are fundamentalist or evangelical Christians who believe you must accept Jesus as your personal savior (and by implication, the Bible as the Word of G-d) or else go to Hell, and who (2) believe G-d is omnipotent, omniscient, and all-loving.

So, this G-d deliberately deceived his created beings by creating fossils, etc. in the earth to give it the appearance of being ancient.

If I may.... what a monster.

I chose option 3.

That's an unusual take. All the YECers I know say they're a result of Noah's flood and what not.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2017, 04:41:08 PM »

My main issue with Young Earth Creationism is this: (1) people who believe in it (without a single exception I know of) are fundamentalist or evangelical Christians who believe you must accept Jesus as your personal savior (and by implication, the Bible as the Word of G-d) or else go to Hell, and who (2) believe G-d is omnipotent, omniscient, and all-loving.

So, this G-d deliberately deceived his created beings by creating fossils, etc. in the earth to give it the appearance of being ancient.

If I may.... what a monster.

I chose option 3.

That's an unusual take. All the YECers I know say they're a result of Noah's flood and what not.

True, but the interpretations that requires (such as the Cretacious and Triassic fossils being buried in a difference of a matter of months, as the premier creationist organization Answers in Genesis argues) would require rates of radioisotope decay to change so quickly during the Flood Period that were it not for supernatural intervention, the Earth would explode as a result of the extreme level of radiation. released over such a quick period of time.  

That's all correct, but I'm not discussing it with them in depth. All I was commenting on is that I've never heard the "God set this up to be a test of faith argument" among the actual creationists I know.

Science has always been a big passion of mine, so I'm sorry if I'm going into the weeds here. Tongue

No worries. It's never been my cup of tea,but we're posting on a politics forum so we should all understand why one might be obsessed with a topic Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 14 queries.