Should Pentecostals be considered their own branch of Christianity? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 09:46:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Should Pentecostals be considered their own branch of Christianity? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 21

Author Topic: Should Pentecostals be considered their own branch of Christianity?  (Read 2133 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« on: September 19, 2016, 06:05:05 AM »

Pentecostals are sometimes criticized for teachings practices that clash with the denominations that came out of the Reformation, most notably speaking in tongues, and modalism in the case of Oneness Pentecostals.

Is this enough of a difference to consider them their own branch of Christianity along with Protestantism, Catholicism etc?
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2016, 03:46:22 PM »

Shia Muslims, and non-Catholic Christians would like to have a word with your chart out back Tongue
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2016, 05:05:22 PM »

Shia Muslims, and non-Catholic Christians would like to have a word with your chart out back Tongue

Besides, why are all the Reformed Churches lumped together while the tiny denominations evolved from the CoE are listed separately? Whoever made this chart is very anglo-centric. Tongue

Gee I hadn't noticed that. Oh here's another one: Pentecostalism emerges around 1750!

Religion is very complicated, so any attempt to graph is bound to oversimplify and make mistakes. On top of that, it always seems that the people that make these charts make a lot of unforced errors that make the charts even worse.

Ok Blue. I'll stop crapping on that chart you found now.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2016, 02:49:02 PM »

Getting back on topic...

I think it would be helpful to use a 'test' like one might develop in a court case to determine what makes a separate wing of Christianity. Here are some potential indicators:

1) Modifying the definition of God
2) Looking to a new authority
3) Introducing major new doctrines
4) Not fellow-shipping with the parent group
5) Significant numbers

Applying this to Pentecostalism, #'s 3 and 5 are a big yes, #4 is a no, and #'s 1 & 2 are 'depends on the sect'. All of that adds up to a big fat 'maybe?'
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2016, 07:14:41 PM »

They usually are.
Catholic
Orthodox
Protestant
Restorationist (the denominations less than 300 years old, that tend to reject long-held teachings: Mormonism, Pentacostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc.)

Orthodox is way too broad.

It is? It's a defined set of churches with shared government structures and a clear theological identity. At least, assuming what's being referred to is Eastern Orthodox rather than small-o orthodox.

Yeah, not quite sure of the reasoning here. If any group is too broad, its Protestantism, i.e. why I started the thread.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 16 queries.