Why should the government define marriage? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 10:57:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Why should the government define marriage? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why should the government define marriage?  (Read 679 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« on: June 28, 2013, 08:52:25 PM »

Perhaps government should just stop sanctioning an institution with a 50% failure rate by removing the tax incentives/benefits that come with getting married in the first place and allowing those benefits to be assigned to individuals instead?

The 50% failure rate is an example of why the government should not be defining marriage. No-fault divorce was a state idea, not the church's.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.