Is Capital a progressively hegemonic historical telos colonizing the whole of human existence? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 11:06:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Is Capital a progressively hegemonic historical telos colonizing the whole of human existence? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: See above
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 19

Author Topic: Is Capital a progressively hegemonic historical telos colonizing the whole of human existence?  (Read 582 times)
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« on: December 24, 2021, 11:16:31 AM »

Marxism is incredibly stupid.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2021, 11:41:27 AM »


Anyone who espouses Marxism in 2021 is not a good faith actor worthy of debate.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2021, 08:50:19 PM »

A little off topic, but what do you think of the four-part book series ('Empire', 'Multitude', 'Commonwealth', and 'Assembly') by post-Marxist philosophers Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri?  

Of these I've only read Empire, and that only once. I have devoted myself to reading everything Marx himself wrote, so my knowledge of some of the tertiary literature is lacking. I'm currently undertaking a study of notions of sovereignty, reading Carl Schmitt in the light of Foucault and Giorgio Agamben, so I am fine with reading it, but I really think all you absolutely need is a line-by-line reading of Marx (I wish Lenin had read, for example, "Conspectus On Bakunin's Statism And Anarchy").
please explain how you were gonna get an anarchist utopia from 1910s russia

Marxists have still never explained how we get from an all powerful proletariat dictatorship with the ability to control and seize everything, kill all nonbelievers, and equalize" society to literally no government anarchy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.