Senate Confirmation Hearing: Sestak for Deputy GM (Confirmed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 05:26:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Senate Confirmation Hearing: Sestak for Deputy GM (Confirmed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Senate Confirmation Hearing: Sestak for Deputy GM (Confirmed)  (Read 3211 times)
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,855
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« on: April 28, 2019, 07:01:09 PM »

Not a Senator, but just wanted to state that as someone who previously served as Deputy GM, I understand the backlog of stories needed to put out, and how hard that can be to get done when real life takes priority. I do have some concern with the fact that the two most recent additions (Scott and Sestak) are both registered in Fremont, and both intend to be in office in Fremont. So I fail to see how this really helps with ensuring equally represented stories can be posted when the two new additions focusing on stories won't be able to post Fremont stories due to conflicts of interest.

If the Deputies can get content out regularly I will pledge to write up 5 or 6 fremont stories my next free weekend to have content ready.

Sestak is also offering to assist with the audit.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,855
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2019, 02:57:26 PM »

Having long championed the concept of a rigorous nomination hearing, I must say I find myself largely in agreement with Wulfric here. And with the utmost respect to YE, the questions he posed are valid and we should seek answers to them. In fact it would be negligent on our part not to inquires as to what assurances we have that the past situation will not be repeated and until the nominee answers them in this thread I cannot vote for his confirmation.
I concur with Yankee. Besides, it's not our job to make life easier for the Labor Party.

Im not in the Labor Party ...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.